The content of this forum is not officially endorsed by Games Workshop, and no challenge is made to any copyright or intellectual property.




Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Welcome to The Great Crusade. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:


Pages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post )

 Unification War Regiments
Pacific
Posted: May 2 2012, 01:28 PM


Captain


Group: Iterators
Posts: 3,263
Member No.: 260
Joined: 26-May 08



Hey guys,

Just toying around with the idea of starting something new, specifically some Unification-era proto-Astartes regiments.

I had got some info from this thread (Unification era thread), regarding what the marines actually were, and since then we have had 'The Outcast Dead' which was extremely enlightening.

Now one of the main reasons for my wanting to try something like this is that there is less known about them. With the FW kits available now for all of the different armour marks, and them even starting to appear in casual 40k player's armies, I wanted to do something again that is less common and that will allow me to try something a bit more wacky in terms of modelling and painting.

Having said that, do we have any more info on Unification-era names and colour schemes? Obviously the Legions themselves would have had their old names in some cases - be it the Dusk Raiders, War Hounds & Luna Wolves etc. But, just wondered if anyone had picked up something I had missed regarding a specific colour scheme or marking?

My only stipulation for this project is that they are not white, after finishing my WE the thought of doing another army in that colour makes my blood turn cold biggrin.gif (although I realise that limits the options severely!)

Of course, that this is an era that might not ever be significantly documented in the Heresy book series means that there is a bit more room for individual input here, so if anyone had any cool ideas about any of the above I would happy to hear them!
Top
ShroudFilm
Posted: May 2 2012, 04:00 PM


The Second Heretic


Group: Admin
Posts: 8,405
Member No.: 1
Joined: 15-January 08



I think I recall that the regiments all wore the same colour armour, and it was only their heraldry that changed?

Silver/iron armour, with horsehair plumes etc, and banners with battle honours and so forth.
Top
malika
Posted: May 2 2012, 05:14 PM


Veteran Sergeant


Group: Imperial Citizens
Posts: 852
Member No.: 661
Joined: 2-April 09



Didn't the Duskraiders have a single arm that was crimson red?

I'm not so sure about all of the regiments being the same colour. I guess that's a bit debatable at the moment.
Top
Pacific
Posted: May 2 2012, 06:33 PM


Captain


Group: Iterators
Posts: 3,263
Member No.: 260
Joined: 26-May 08



Thanks for the replies guys.

OK, so the colours came after the Legions were formed (and the Great Crusade began?)

Anyone have any info on a Blood Angels, and specifically whether or not they had a name change? I read somewhere (I can't remember where, perhaps the BA codex?) that the 'Legion was made' when the Crusade moved to Baal, or some such like?

It does seem mildly paradoxical that they would have been named as such prior to the discovery of Sanguinius - although I'm still not clear whether or not the traits of each Primarch were manifest in each Legion prior to the discovery of their Primarch. Although even if that were the case, that still doesn't explain the unlikely coincidence of someone like Russ (with enlarged canines) landing amongst 'wolves' on Fenris, Konrad Kurze on Nocturne etc.

Perhaps something in the Primarch's genetic engineering that made them adapt to the world that they had landed on as they grew?
Top
ShroudFilm
Posted: May 2 2012, 06:51 PM


The Second Heretic


Group: Admin
Posts: 8,405
Member No.: 1
Joined: 15-January 08



Thunder Regiments aren't the Legions... that's the difference! wink.gif

There would likely have been more than twenty regiments. The only descriptions we've had of the regiments show them as plain-armoured barbarians.

I feel another argument-winning product commissioning coming on... laugh.gif
Top
Apologist
Posted: May 2 2012, 09:32 PM


Archmagos Veneratus


Group: Champions
Posts: 1,083
Member No.: 137
Joined: 28-February 08



A perfect opportunity to make a Legio II or XI that doesn't make people involuntarily twitch... wink.gif

There's not a huge amount of information on the period, but what little we have should leave a great deal open for wonderful creativity!

Unification War Legion Names
Explicitly mentioned:
Dusk Raiders later became Death Guard (Flight of the Eisenstein).
Warhounds later became World Eaters (After Desh'ea).
Imperial Heralds later became Word Bearers (The First Heretic)
Thousand Sons were always the Thousand Sons (A Thousand Sons)
Raven Guard were called the Raven Guard prior to reuniting with Corax (Deliverance Lost)

Implicitly mentioned:
The Dark Angels are referred to as the 'First Legion'; whether this is an honorific or simply a description is arguable.

What can we conclude from this? Given that at least five of the Legions had names, it's reasonable to suppose that the remainder may well have too. Equally, some may have simply been referred to by number – you'll need to make a decision yourself.

If you do run with creating new names, then it's worth noting that the Thousand Sons are mentioned to be named so in wibbly-wobbly timey-wimey consultation with Magnus himself, and that Magnus was unusual (likely unique) in this role, explaining the rather unlikely coincidence of the name.

With this in mind, some of the names are rather more likely to have been changed after reuniting the Legion with its Primarch:

Blood Angels – named after the tribe of the Blood (Index Astartes Blood Angels), this name is almost certain not to have been in use pre-Baal. Given the effect of the Primarch's geneseed on the Astartes' appearance, the word Angel might still have been used (Emperor's Angels, Imperial Angels etc); though I'd suspect such a religious term would have been rather derisive under the Imperial Truth, so I'd personally steer clear entirely.

Dark Angels – similarly, the word angel might have been sniffed at; and we already have an implied title of First Legion. However, this could easily go either way.

Emperor's Children – No reason this couldn't have been a permanent name. Given the history of the Legion (the disaster that marred their early years and necessitated their auxiliary function to the Luna Wolves), I could see them being ribbed by the XVII as favoured, or pampered – the Emperor's favoured children...

Luna Wolves – Fairly likely to have been the Legion's original name, given the reluctance to change, the reference to Luna (I can't really think of a better explanation than this being a reference to Earth's Moon).

Ultramarines – It's unclear whether Ultramar is named after the Ultramarines, or the other way around. Since the word has connotations of Crusaders ('Outremar' lit. 'over the sea' was the term used for the Mediaeval Crusaders), it may have been the original name. Personally, I like the idea that Legio XIII were named 'Ultramarines' after coming through the 'Sea of Souls' to Macragge, and that they had another name. 'Warrior Kings' is a cool name, and it fits with established canon – they became the 'Warrior Kings of Ultramar' The First Heretic, and then Ultramarines.

Imperial Fists – No particular reason to suppose this was changed, given Dorn's no nonsense, obedient attitude. Since it ties into the Imperial Heralds naming scheme too, I'd be inclined to say this is likely to be a Unification Wars name; which would tally with the Roma battle honour mentioned as the first of the Fists' battle honours.

White Scars – Could go either way; but barring retcon/adaptation, more likely to be a post-Unification name, as the scarification is referenced to be a practice of the plains tribes.

Alpha Legion – I'd be tempted to say this was a Unification era name, as 'the' Primarch was hardly a self-glorifying type. Most likely 'he' simply didn't change it.

Iron Hands/Salamanders – Like the Blood Angels, these really don't make much sense unless you know specifics of the Primarch/planet.

Iron Warriors – Generic enough to be a Unification-era name, with no particular relevance to Perturabo.

Space Wolves – Given they don't call themselves this, but bearing in mind that 'there are no wolves on Fenris', it sounds to me that this may well be a Unification era name from which they tried to distance themselves. It is similar enough to the Luna Wolves to be appropriate. Equally, perhaps Space Wolves became their title after the implied sanctioning – a subtly disrespectful title of a ruthless Legion?

Night Lords – Could go either way. Ties in a little too neatly to Kurze, but it does have a nice resonance with the Dusk Raiders, don't you think?

+++
Here's my fantasy Legion line-up:
1 The First Legion (Black)
2 Solar Guard (Gold)
3 Emperor's Children (Purple)
4 Iron Warriors (Silver)
5 White Stars (White)
6 Space Wolves (Grey)
7 Imperial Fists (Gold)
8 Night Lords (Blue)
9 Morningstars (White)
10 Stormbreakers (Black)
11 Thunder Lords (Purple and turquoise quartered)
12 Warhounds (White with blue shoulder pads)
13 Warrior Kings (Blue)
14 Dusk Raiders (White with red arm)
15 Thousand Sons (Red)
16 Luna Wolves (Grey)
17 Imperial Heralds (Gold)
18 Emperor's Hammers (Red)
19 Raven Guard (Black)
20 Alpha Legion (Purple)

...but that's pure geek indulgence on my part wink.gif

++++++

Unification-era Regiments
Re: non-Astartes regiments, I'd assumed that there were many Thunder Warrior regiments that were relatively unstable – the Astartes being the result of continuing experimentation upon subjects, improved with the help of the Primarch project offshoots.

As such, I'd imagine the Thunder Warriors' formations would have simply been numbered, and as Shroud says, simply armed and armoured with undecorated weaponry. The Emperor presumably knew they were a stop-gap measure, fit for purpose; and the ethos of the era was very much technobarbarian. I don't see the Thunder Warriors as orderly, well-drilled or tightly-organised compared to the Legions – in fact, it's as roaming, faceless and merciless monsters, steaming in the mist; clad in steel and grimy furs and leathers that they appear in my mind's eye.

The Astartes were a perfected army for Crusade: propaganda and morale-boosters. They must have been and intended to awe the human diaspora and bring humanity together. In contrast, the Thunder Warriors were brutes – smashing the Terran barbarians to the floor and then grinding their faces under their boots in a wave of sweat, blood and piss: a brutal force for a more brutal and more desperate time.

Anyway, getting rather carried away there(!). So, there's my speculation. Hope it helps.
Top
Pacific
Posted: May 2 2012, 09:50 PM


Captain


Group: Iterators
Posts: 3,263
Member No.: 260
Joined: 26-May 08



Wow, what a post Apologist! smile.gif

It made very interesting reading. I concur entirely concerning how you view the proto-Astartes, and in fact had something similar in mind in terms of how I would model them; lots of metal plate, rather more primitive looking than the Astartes armour, and horrific-looking close combat weapons, powerful short range weaponry and clad in fur cloaks etc.

Incidentally, is there any reason you thought the War Hounds would be red?


Top
Apologist
Posted: May 2 2012, 10:05 PM


Archmagos Veneratus


Group: Champions
Posts: 1,083
Member No.: 137
Joined: 28-February 08



QUOTE (Pacific @ May 2 2012, 09:50 PM)
Incidentally, is there any reason you thought the War Hounds would be red?

Because I'm a numpty – got the Morningstars mixed up with the Space Wolves, too. laugh.gif

Weaponry of the Unification war
The boltgun was the signature weapon of the Thunder Warriors; though whether it was simply the bolt ammunition used in modified autoguns – or the manufacturing base was sufficient to produce a dedicated 'pattern' – is debatable.

From the descriptions of Thunder Armour, it's clear that much, if not most, of the fighting in which it involved was infantry-based and very much predicated on upper body strength. I'd hazard a guess that the Thunder Armour used by the Astartes was inspired by the armour used by the Thunder Warriors – merely tidied up, refined and standardised. After all, it was used on Terra by the Astartes, and replaced in short order once off-planet fighting was necessary and the Great Crusade kicked off.

Given the close-quarter, low-tech and ferocious nature of the Unification Wars, I think close-in stabbing weaponry would be common, and I'd like to think that it was the Unification Wars that inspired the development and popularisation of chain weaponry. I've never been that convinced by descriptions of chainswords being used to parry and fence – I imagine their use was simply an excellent relatively low-tech way to visit 'shock and awe' on easily-terrified enemies – the teeth would make a horrendous mess taht would unman most victims' allies. Equally, it would enable a well-armoured warrior to overcome an equally or better armoured opponent – simply lean in, trusting your armour is mostly impervious to their weaponry, and the teeth will shred their way through exposed cables, depowering an opponent; or better still, snagging, unbalancing and dragging them to the floor, where they're exposed and easy meat for your allies. Basically, no need to grind through armour – simply swing and use your power armour-enhanced strength to hold your arm steady while they're dragged to the floor.
Top
Ilmarinen
Posted: May 2 2012, 10:25 PM


Ghost of Terra


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,915
Member No.: 360
Joined: 12-August 08



There are still several aspects of the early Great Crusade that are unclear (at least to me!).

What was the relation between the Thunder Regiments and the Legions? Was there a period of crossover, and how rapidly did the handover occur? Were the names carried over, or did the Legions get brand new names?

What was the order and timing of each Legion's founding, and how did this compare to the finding of their Primarchs? The old fluff mentions that some Legions were founded only just before their Primarch was discovered, whereas the fluff also mentions other Legions having to wait a long time to be united with their liege lord.

Did all of the Legions fight on Terra prior to the GC, or were the later founded Legions established only to immediately depart on the Great Crusade?

What armour mark did each Legion start with? Did some of them start with Mk1? Or was that already obsolete by the time the space marines were created? Did the later Legions start with newer armour marks - eg: did the Alpha Legion start with Mk4?

C:SM has a picture of all the armour marks in Ultramarine colours (including Mk1) but this may be poetic licence?
Top
lord_caldera
Posted: May 3 2012, 12:19 AM


Brother-Chaplain


Group: Champions
Posts: 599
Member No.: 422
Joined: 30-September 08



I haven't read this in a while and I don't have my book on me, but isn't there a reference in "Tales of Heresy" (maybe in Scions of the Storm?) where the ninth legion is referred to as angels of blood by their victims?
Top
Noserenda
Posted: May 3 2012, 09:39 AM


Battle-Brother


Group: Imperial Citizens
Posts: 187
Member No.: 775
Joined: 21-September 09



Awesome as ever Apologist smile.gif

As an idea it might be worth looking at the Second Founding Chapters names for ideas, they all came from somewhere, perhaps the Original legion name? Ofc theres no way to verify so far as only traitors have had their old names revealed!
Top
Apologist
Posted: May 3 2012, 10:11 AM


Archmagos Veneratus


Group: Champions
Posts: 1,083
Member No.: 137
Joined: 28-February 08



QUOTE
What was the relation between the Thunder Regiments and the Legions? Was there a period of crossover, and how rapidly did the handover occur? Were the names carried over, or did the Legions get brand new names?


TIMELINE
As far as I understand it, and based largely on hints from WD129, Legion and The Outcast Dead, the background for the events of Terra currently run as follows:

~M25:
• Age of Strife isolates the Sol system from the rest of humanity. The Emperor begins his plans for the Great Crusade in secret.

M25–M27:
• War rages across the Sol system, between (and on) the principal planets (and planetary bodies, as Luna is mentioned).
• Mars and Terra (at least) are ravaged by nuclear, biological and chemical warfare.

Late M27–M29:
• Central government of Terra reduced to warring states led by Warlords.
• Appearance of the Emperor, along with the first genetically-enhanced soldiers (the proto Imperial Army), later to become the Old Hundred. At some point, the Emperor must have got to Luna, as he has laboratories there.
• Development of the Thunder Warriors – possibly the logical next stage of the geno-soldiers. Something is wrong with the Thunder Warriors; they are somehow unstable.
• Battle of Mount Ararat – possibly apocryphal last battle of the Unification Wars, at which the Thunder Warriors are supposedly all slain. The Emperor conquers Terra and Luna. End of the Unification Wars.
• Primarch project begun. Final Thunder Warriors 'disappear'.
• Primarchs scattered. The Emperor uses the research to develop the Legio Astartes and Custodes (I speculate as a development/combination of the Geno/Thunder Warrior research with the results of the Primarch project).

M30:
• Treaty of Mars/Treaty of Olympus binds Terra to the Mechanicum of Mars, creating the Imperium proper.
• Start of the Great Crusade. Astartes conquer the Sol system.

Armour
Recent years have seen clarification and development of the very vague background mentioned in WD129; and a great deal of this is the clear distinction now made between the Thunder Warriors and the Astartes. As such, the Thunder Warriors may represent the ultimate refinement possible on humans without the (presumably stabilising) information gleaned from the Primarch project – which would explain why Babu Dhakal was so keen to get hold of Astartes geneseed.

I'm inclined to think that Crusade Armour (Mark II) was the first armour that the Astartes were issued en masse. While some (see later notes about order of the Legions' creation, and speed of producing Astartes) may have worn something that was – in-universe – retroactively named Thunder Armour, it's been hinted that the Unification Wars were over before the Astartes were created. That's not to say that the Legions didn't exist, at least in name – but it's a far from clear at the moment.

My explanation would be that Thunder Armour was a term that was applied to the armour worn by the Thunder Warriors at the close of the Unification War. As such, it would have been the final refinement of two and a half thousand years of such powered armour, and the stuff worn at the Battle of Mount Ararat would have borne little resemblance to that worn by the initial Thunder Warriors.

As a metaphor, think of real world plate armour development between Roman Britain and the Tudor period – it became more sophisticated and protective, but by the reign of Henry VIII, it was on its way out and a new approach was needed.
In this metaphor, Henry VIII's suit of armour at the Tower of London would have been the equivalent of the the Astartes' Thunder Armour suits – it would have worked perfectly well, but was so flamboyant and expensive compared to its usefulness that it was almost an anachronism.

After the Treaty of Mars/Treaty of Olympus, the tech would have been in place for the development of proper sealed suits for fighting on non-terraformed worlds –thus Crusade Armour.

Legion foundings
QUOTE
What was the order and timing of each Legion's founding, and how did this compare to the finding of their Primarchs? The old fluff mentions that some Legions were founded only just before their Primarch was discovered, whereas the fluff also mentions other Legions having to wait a long time to be united with their liege lord.

Given that the Astartes weren't created until after the end of the Unification Wars, we've got a cut-off date. No Astartes can have been created before the Primarch project, and that's stated to have been after the end of the Unification Wars.

However, it's possible that Astartes were placed into Legions that already existed, hence why the Imperial Fists can have a Roma battle honour from the Unification Wars. This does require the Legions to either still be in service, and (presumably) have included genowarriors, or be the dormant Legions of the Thunder Warriors' – basically the Emperor pulling the memberless Legion out of mothballs with a recruitment campaign.

This interpretation is a bit of a headscratcher, given the info in The Outcast Dead, as the Emperor would probably want to draw as little attention to the fate of the Thunder Warriors as possible! However, what better place to hide it than in plain sight? The official Imperial story is that the Thunder Warriors all died heroically at the Battle of Mount Ararat, so reviving the honoured old Legions with the 'new improved' Astartes standing in the footsteps of the Thunder Warriors would be simultaneously a great way to commemorate the memory of the Thunder Warriors, give the Astartes some history and heroes to strive to emulate, and neatly muddy the waters of the sinister endings of the Thunder Warriors themselves.

Out of universe, this would go some way to explaining:
• How the Space Marines (whose origins are predicated on the research from thee Primarch project) can trace their origins back to the Unification Wars despite the Primarch project happening afterwards.
• Why the Thunder Warriors were 'deleted', and how it was covered up
• How the Legions fought in Thunder Armour during the Unification War.

It makes sense to me that the Astartes weren't all created at once. For a start, even given the resources available to him, the Emperor wouldn't have been able to immediately and simultaneously create hundreds of thousands of warriors. On top of that, we know at least two Legions – Emperor's Children and Thousand Sons – had severe 'recruitment problems'; that the Alpha Legion were implied to be created after the other Legions.

QUOTE
Did all of the Legions fight on Terra prior to the GC, or were the later founded Legions established only to immediately depart on the Great Crusade?

No Astartes fought in the Unification War; but if (and I stress it's a big if, as my thesis is based heavily on supposition) the Astartes were placed into old Thunder Warriors' Legions, it's possible for Legio IV (for example) to have fought in the Unification War. I hope that makes some sense?

That's not to say that no Astartes ever fought on Terra – while the Unification Wars were over, we know that Terra (and presumably Luna) held some resistance to Imperial Rule (Blood Games); which would allow a slim window between the Astartes being created and the Treaty of Mars/Treaty of Olympus – so going back on my earlier comment, we could have had Astartes in Legions wearing Thunder Armour (the 'posh', refined sort) fighting rebels on Terra – which would explain why you could have Terran veterans.*

QUOTE
What armour mark did each Legion start with? Did some of them start with Mk1? Or was that already obsolete by the time the space marines were created? Did the later Legions start with newer armour marks - eg: did the Alpha Legion start with Mk4?

Assuming the following:
• The Astartes were organised into Legions immediately.
• The Legions' numbering has some relevance – i.e. lower numbers were formed first.
• The Legions were created at different rates – some were more stable than others.

We can assume that the Dark Angels (as an early Legion) would have been formed on Terra, issued with the posh Thunder Armour, and would have fought rebels in the few years between the end of the Unification Wars and before the Treaty of Mars/Treaty of Olympus – but that it would have been a very short period, with the armour being almost immediately replaced with Crusade Armour after the Treaty of Mars/Treaty of Olympus.

Conversely, the Alpha Legion (as a later Legion) would never have been issued with Thunder Armour – and potentially only a small core were issued with Crusade Armour, with the swelling numbers being issued with Mark IV straight away.

Unfortunately, we don't know for sure how many Astartes were being developed/trained, but I'd be inclined to say that the early campaigns of the Great Crusade could have been prosecuted by the seeds of most of the Legions. Remember that the speed with which Astartes could be created went up hugely when they were reunited with their Primarch (Index Astartes), so the early Legions would need only have been relatively small – perhaps only a thousand or so, which makes the Emperor's Children mere two hundred members small, but not insignificant. It'd also make the traditional formations, such as the seven companies of the Death Guard etc. make sense.

Theoretical:
As a situation to explain my thinking, let's look at the Compliance of the Sol system; presumably the first campaign of the Great Crusade. The Legions exist, and are made up exclusively of Astartes. We have ~15,000 Astartes split across 16 or so active Legions (inactive ones include the Thousand Sons, Emperor's Children and Alpha Legion); with most Legions made up of slightly fewer than 1,000 Astartes.

These numbers are purely hypothetical. If the organisation of Space Marine development were different, we could have had only three or four Legions – each only a few hundred strong – conquering the Sol system, with the later Legions nothing more than stored geneseed at this time. As the Great Crusade expanded, the remaining Legions could have been brought into active service at pretty much any period – so the first Alpha Legionnaires could have been recruited and trained, issued with Mark IV and sent out to fight nearly two centuries after the first Dark Angels had been conquering the Sol system. That might explain why they were noted as 'tall' (Index Astares: Alpha Legion) – refinements in the process learned from earlier Legions and the Primarchs discovered over the decades – and why they were only just starting out on Crusade when Alpharius was recovered.


QUOTE
C:SM has a picture of all the armour marks in Ultramarine colours (including Mk1) but this may be poetic licence?

As noted in WD129, Thunder Armour is in use by Chapters in M41, though mainly as honour guard. There's no reason it wouldn't have been repainted at some point – nor that the Astartes Legions didn't take some 'dress suits' with them on the Great Crusade, never intending them for anything more than special occasions etc.

If my theory is right – and I urge you to take it with a pinch of salt – then wearing Thunder Armour to honour the pre-Astartes members of the Legions (i.e. the Thunder Warriors) at special occasions and ceremonies would fit right in with what we know of the Astartes warrior cults/traditions/lodges/practises from books like Horus Rising. After all, these traditions have to have arisen from somewhere – I find the theory that the Astartes, who never directly met the Thunder Warriors, would view them with respect as metaphorical ancestral heroes, a good one.

Resurrecting the Thunder Warriors' old Legions and indoctrinating the Space Marines Legions to follow the traditions would be a great way for the Emperor to cement the Astartes Legions' loyalty, and we know he was a master of propaganda. It would also explain why the Thunder Warriors in The Outcast Dead were viewed as they were by the Astartes; and why the later Legions (Alpha Legion) were perhaps less traditional (though that's by-the-by).

+++

Note
While my post is based on the hints and info we've been given, I stress that there simply isn't much information out there. I've made some jumps and leaps in deduction, but I think it all holds together with the canon information, and I've tried not to contradict the spirit or theme when I've had to square the circle.

I hope it's a useful post for your project, but I emphasise that the information is not set in stone – it's merely my interpretation of 25 years of hints! smile.gif


*An easier explanation for this term in the Horus Heresy series is that the Terran Veterans are simply veterans (i.e. have fought since the start of the Great Crusade) from Terra; rather than veterans of a conflict on Terra.
Top
ShroudFilm
Posted: May 3 2012, 10:12 AM


The Second Heretic


Group: Admin
Posts: 8,405
Member No.: 1
Joined: 15-January 08



The Alpha Legion were only founded very shortly before Alpharius was discovered... which was about 20 years before 'Horus Rising'.
Top
BigWill
Posted: May 3 2012, 10:21 AM


The Sigillite


Group: Iterators
Posts: 4,650
Member No.: 17
Joined: 15-January 08



beat me to it
I remember the part where they talk about the Emperor's foresight ordering the Alpha Legion Formed 20 years before discovery.
Top
Apologist
Posted: May 3 2012, 10:40 AM


Archmagos Veneratus


Group: Champions
Posts: 1,083
Member No.: 137
Joined: 28-February 08



Sorry – ninja edit. ninja.gif

Relevant section:
QUOTE
As a situation to explain my thinking, let's look at the Compliance of the Sol system; presumably the first campaign of the Great Crusade. The Legions exist, and are made up exclusively of Astartes. We have ~15,000 Astartes split across 16 or so active Legions (inactive ones include the Thousand Sons, Emperor's Children and Alpha Legion); with most Legions made up of slightly fewer than 1,000 Astartes.

These numbers are purely hypothetical. If the organisation of Space Marine development were different, we could have had only three or four Legions – each only a few hundred strong – conquering the Sol system, with the later Legions nothing more than stored geneseed at this time. As the Great Crusade expanded, the remaining Legions could have been brought into active service at pretty much any period – so the first Alpha Legionnaires could have been recruited and trained, issued with Mark IV and sent out to fight nearly two centuries after the first Dark Angels had been conquering the Sol system. That might explain why they were noted as 'tall' (Index Astares: Alpha Legion) – refinements in the process learned from earlier Legions and the Primarchs discovered over the decades – and why they were only just starting out on Crusade when Alpharius was recovered.
Top
BigWill
Posted: May 3 2012, 11:12 AM


The Sigillite


Group: Iterators
Posts: 4,650
Member No.: 17
Joined: 15-January 08



I think a bulk of the legions were on Terra right after unification,that short period you talk of fighting terran rebels was the Astartes final exam if you will.
Outcast Dead made it sound kind of like the Emp did not want Thunder Warriors around after unification and the unstabilty was on purpose.

Who says the Emp was always out fighting,I bet there were lots of times he was nowhere to be found because he was at the lab.
Thunder Warriors were made out of nesesscity,but the Emp is 30k years smart
He would know a large group of supermen would be a problem after the fighting is done,so he builds them to burn themselves out.
Now I remember the Primarchs were made because Astartes were so tough they needed Demi-Gods to lead them.
He call them his sons and with that loyalty he controls the primarchs who control the Legions.
Horus was very correct in assuming after the crusade they would be reduced to a policing role
Probally why the council was formed to slowly take control back,it was not by mistake the Primarchs were losing power and were made a separte entity by making Horus Warmaster.

That's my tired 2 cents after working 20 hrs
Top
Ilmarinen
Posted: May 3 2012, 11:56 AM


Ghost of Terra


Group: Admin
Posts: 1,915
Member No.: 360
Joined: 12-August 08



Some excellent speculation there Apologist. Very interesting indeed.

Some random thoughts:

1. When did the Mechanicum of Mars originate in it's current form? (bearing in mind that Terra was split into multiple factions, but the Mechanicum didn't manage to conquer Terra ...or didn't want to?)

2. Who were on the other planets in the Sol system? (what factions needed conquering after the Unification of Terra?)

3. Given the longevity of AM Magi, many of them presumably remember fighting against Terran (and other) factions, possibly against the Emperor too?

Top
BigWill
Posted: May 3 2012, 12:27 PM


The Sigillite


Group: Iterators
Posts: 4,650
Member No.: 17
Joined: 15-January 08



One thing I know Mars exploratorer teams would go to earth during the age of strife to secure hidden tech

Seems if any credence is given to Battle for the Abyss,Saturn was another player in the game with the Saturine Fleets,otherwise it would not be a big deal that it was the good ships captains last flight before the Saturine Fleet was absorbed into the Imperium Fleets proper.

This post has been edited by BigWill on May 3 2012, 12:30 PM
Top
Apologist
Posted: May 3 2012, 01:10 PM


Archmagos Veneratus


Group: Champions
Posts: 1,083
Member No.: 137
Joined: 28-February 08



QUOTE
1. When did the Mechanicum of Mars originate in it's current form? (bearing in mind that Terra was split into multiple factions, but the Mechanicum didn't manage to conquer Terra ...or didn't want to?)


Short answer: Mars was terraformed during the Age of Technology, then lost its atmosphere due to war during the Age of Strife. The Mechanicum arose as a Machine-worshipping priesthood defending the radiation bunkers in the aftermath of the war, and became the dominant – and then only – faction a considerable time prior to the Unification Wars, during which time they mounted raids to Terra to recover Archeotech, and sent seeding fleets out establishing the Forgeworlds. I think this is outlined in Codex Titanicus and Mechanicum, but unfortunately have neither with me.

While the Mechanicum may have possessed the ability to conquer Terra, the political will wasn't there – humanity's homeworld had been reduced to barbarism, and if the Mechanicum could recover the fragments of technology, they were happy. In short, their aims were not opposed to the Emperor (or the other Warlords), and they had no interest in Terra.

QUOTE
2. Who were on the other planets in the Sol system? (what factions needed conquering after the Unification of Terra?)

We know of M31-era inhabitants of Saturn and Jupiter (by implication, the moons of same); and that Pluto had become weaponised. I vaguely remember a reference to something or someone from Mercury, too, but don't quote me on that.

Supposition: I think the asteroid belt and other major dwarf planets/satellites (Ceres in the Asteroid belt, for example) could well have been colonised, if only for mining etc. rather than as competing factions.

QUOTE
3. Given the longevity of AM Magi, many of them presumably remember fighting against Terran (and other) factions, possibly against the Emperor too?

Potentially, yes; and they may have formed part of what would become the Dark Mechanicum. We know from Mechanicum that many of the Cult Mechanicus opposed the Emperor's will and interpretation of him as the Omnissiah.
Top
Brother Handro
Posted: May 3 2012, 01:59 PM


Scion of Barbarus


Group: Loyalists
Posts: 367
Member No.: 47
Joined: 17-January 08



Great posts from all of you, especially Apologist.

Once again I must register my distaste at the late founding of the Alpha Legion.

I'm no fanboy of that particular legion, but it just doesn't make any sense when viewed from a distance. The boy, (I forget his name, the one in Liar's Due) has a copy of Insignum Astartes, so the heraldry of the Legions would be well known. People would be raised with Imperial propaganda for nearly two centuries 'oh the Emperor created 20 legions to unite humanity!...except we've never seen the 20th one...oh and we don't talk about two of them any more...oh the Emperor created 17 legions to unite humanity, with one in cold storage...' rolleyes.gif

There's an awfully big papertrail to deal with when having to make people forget about the two missing legions, or to introduce the latest legion when it pops into existence.

And, while I'm going completely off-topic, what would populations brought into compliance by the two missing legions do after their airbrushing from history? That's a lot of people to keep quiet. Exterminatus? Or does the fact that this isn't an issue imply the two legions didn't do a lot of liberating before being dealt with, leaving less mess to clear up?

Just idle speculation on my part but interesting! biggrin.gif
Top
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you

Topic OptionsPages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last »



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1033 seconds | Archive
Warvault
Webring