Title: Inter-Liverpool
Description: good for Roma?
LI Matt - March 11, 2008 09:43 PM (GMT)
Before the game, I was thinking that either result could be spun as good for Roma. An Inter win would mean more midweek games and less focus on the league, while a loss sends the crisi level to new heights.
Twiggster - March 11, 2008 11:54 PM (GMT)
didn't see the game as Leeds were getting smacked at home....what a SHIT footy night! :angry:
Inter will still win their league...no distractions now.
elisa - March 12, 2008 06:19 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Twiggster @ Mar 11 2008, 03:54 PM) |
didn't see the game as Leeds were getting smacked at home....what a SHIT footy night! :angry:
Inter will still win their league...no distractions now. |
Twiggy,
What do you think of Mancio resigning? This was supposed to be their big year to prove they were contenders in Europe and the league.
SirHenry - March 12, 2008 02:56 PM (GMT)
Contending for what??? Couch potatoes???
chelski - March 12, 2008 04:54 PM (GMT)
When a manager sets an exact date for when he's going, the usual effect is to completely destabalise the club. It's a huge tactical mistake. The result is likely that Inter don't win the league and have a new manager in place before the end of the season.
Romagirl - March 12, 2008 05:01 PM (GMT)
It's a catch 22. Had they stayed in the CL, then they would have had more games to play and risked more injuries - that could have played in our favor, but remember - it would be the same for Roma.
I think Mancini said what he said in the heat of the moment. But you have to admit, it IS pretty destabilizing, especially when NO ONE (players/management) knew that he felt that way. I'd be sorry to see him leave - I think he's a great coach.
chelski - March 12, 2008 11:11 PM (GMT)
Looks like he's staying now.
Twiggster - March 13, 2008 02:53 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (chelski @ Mar 13 2008, 12:11 AM) |
| Looks like he's staying now. |
