Lynet suggested that the alliterative alphabet game was tough, so I thought I would breathe life into an idea I had a while back.

The rules are simple :P

• First letter of each post follows the A-Z rule
• Posts must follow the 3 word, 4 word, 5 word, 4 word, 3 word sequence
• Words in posts must begin with the same letter that the preceeding word (in the same post) ended
• Finally the associative thing: Each post must make some sort of associative connection with the post above it.

So ... I'll kick off, shall I?

Authors spell libel
:whistle:

Books start torid denials


(Sheesh! This is easier?)

Careful librarian never reads suggestively

(Go on stretch your wordsmithery :P)

Dreadful reading kills people?

(Did I do it right? Not sure I got everything.. Too many ruleses! :P)

Egregious syntaxing gaffs slay young girl

I have no idea how to play this game, either. Is that anywhere near correct? And yes, I know syntaxing is probably not a word but you try using a word starting with X.

LOL, SB, that was six words when 3 were needed. But all the other rules were followed. Muffin, met all the all the rules except beginning the next word with the last letter of the previous one ....

So, we're at F, eh?

Fishermen never read (taking an alternate meaning from SB's gaff ;) )

(And if Lynet doesn't stop complaining that this is is hard I will add an additional rule that all her posts must be palindromic. :dies: )

:dies:

Gigantic Cuskeel lingers stoutly

A Cuskeel is a fish found off the Atlantic coast of Africa, by the way. ;)

Hoping gaff falls

(See, I didn't even realize this game was alphabetical. I was going by the last letter of the previous post. The fact that it was alphabetical was purely accidental.

This game is NOT simple at all, unless you have a devilishly twisted mind.)

:ph43r:

Ignorance empties somebody's skull


:moon:

Janitor removes skull leakage expertly. <_<

Huh? :huh:

I really don't understand rule no. 3 ... I don't see anyone ending their words with the next letter that follows. Or are they? I'm confused. :unsure:

OK, I'm just going to try to roll with this. This is what the janitor is thinking while he's cleaning up the skull leakage...

Kids are too messy!

Laughing goats smirk

Many yetis smack kids!

No one eats snacks, sadly, yetis squashed dem. :rofl:

:ar:

Oh! How witches subvert! :P

Possibly you're expecting good deeds? Silly.

Quixotically? Yeah, honey.

Rash herald! Deeds survive.

Oh, I get it now! Thanks Mirelly.

Snacks saved Doris. :rolleyes:

Testimonials salvaged Doritos sales.

Underweight taco overstockages stifle economy

Vitamin needs skyrocket.

Whilst tacos still linger ... :rolleyes:

...X-rayed despite extremely yucky yokes :mexwave:

Zany yokels stare endlessly

Now what?

You underestimate errors.

:erm:

(I thought that since it's 3-4-5-4-3 that it would also be a-b-c-...-x-y-z-y-x-...-c-b-a)

:beshtfriend:

xenophobic chavs say: yaaaaaay!!!!

Yellow weasels still peep passively

:P

Zena already yodeled, dumbass!

:rolleyes: Heh.

Xylophones stopped Dumbasses!

P...Q...R...S...T...U...V...W...X...Z...N...Y...X...Y...Z...X :blink: :unsure:

Worrisome examples still linger

(So whose alphabet are we using here? :ar: Honestly, I'm laughing so hard I wet my pants. Are we writers? In what language?)

:rofl: I didn't notice that! I think we're following the XYZ alphabet. :P :D

OK, OK, for real this time!

Ants stole everyone's stockings. See? :o

No, no, we're going backwards. So the next installment should be V.

Verily you understand, dost thou?

(Yeah, yeah, lame.)

Lynet, your post cracked me up. Seriously. Sitting here laughing in my cubicle.

Understanding gnomes stare endlessly.

Testy yesmen nicker.

Singing grand double entendres

risqué entertainment trailed dynamic chortling

:phew: <memo to self, need new smiley>

quite enough hijinks since ensued

purpling grim matron noses