j
| · Board Rules · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Bowserjoe |
Posted on Jan 25 2006, 05:32 PM
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 92 Member No.: 1 Joined: 17-January 06 |
I think Steel Phantom would have been better if it was smooth, but it was not. I still wish I could have ridden it though. Phantom's Revenge looks fun, but they could have done more with the layout and made it longer. I don't think SP should have been destroyed. I'm sure PR was built to be smoother, more comfortable, and more suitable for families, but I still vote for SP.
-------------------- |
| eddie200330 |
Posted on Mar 29 2006, 09:24 PM
|
|
Kiddie Coaster Group: Members Posts: 10 Member No.: 12 Joined: 27-March 06 |
SP was ok, just went too fast to handle the inversions. If they would have had more runnoff time before the loops it would have been better. In the same token, PR goes entirely too fast over the last half of the ride to the point whiplash is almost happening.It kinda causes some soreness to the lower back. It needs to be a bit longer, which is noticeable when they try to do 2 trains. They have to slow the lift down in order to get the second train loaded and ready to go when the first one lets go of the chain lift. I don't think it would stop before entering the station without snapping everyone's neck!!!
-------------------- Somewhere out there is a banana for everyone........????????
|
| Bowserjoe |
Posted on Mar 29 2006, 09:58 PM
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 92 Member No.: 1 Joined: 17-January 06 |
So PR is kind of painful? I still hope to ride it someday, but I still wish I could've ridden SP!
-------------------- |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |