Pages: (3) 1 2 [3]  ( Go to first unread post )

 Top 5 9/11 Smoking guns, Red flags, holes, cover-ups, clues, etc
disbeliever
Posted: Sep 20 2006, 04:09 AM


Newbie


Group: Banned
Posts: 4
Member No.: 5,744
Joined: 20-September 06



Loose Change raises many questions that haven't been adequately explored in the mainstream media and they certainly deserve to be examined;

However, to believe that there was a conspiracy involving government personnel, I need some general answers to a few questions:

When was this conspiracy hatched?

Were the attacks on WTC in 93, the bombs in the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, the attack on the USS Cole, planned and executed by the 9/11 conspirators?

Are Al Qaeda real? (i.e. do they have independent goals, plans and actions or are they now (or always been) a US fiction or client)?

How many people (and agencies within the Government) do you think were involved in the planning, execution and cover-up of the conspiracy (100??? 1,000??? 10,000)???

How come Bush and Co (as nefarious as they might be) couldn't keep the NSA wire-taps and data mining, the "Black Sites", the "Extraordinary Rendition", etc, secret for very long and yet no one person in the 9/11 conspiracy has come forward or leaked info???

Why, if these conspirators can plot, plan, and execute 9/11, couldn't they plant evidence of WMD's in Iraq?

Why would the conspirators shoot a missile into the Pentagon instead of using a commerical airplane as they did in the 3 other crashes? Why risk people seeing/filming a fighter plane shooting a missile?

If the cell phone calls were fakes, how could they have pulled this off convincingly? Among other things, the 9/11 conspirators would have to get the names of passengers off flight lists - presumably with 2 weeks or less notice - find out their cell phone numbers, the numbers of their loved ones, get a reasonable facsimile of their voice, and then fool close relatives and friends with authentic sounding messages? And, of course, why go through this trouble of faking cell phone messages at all??? Why make fake cell phone calls and risk exposure by independent investigators like those in Loose Change???

Lastly, why haven't the makers of Loose Change been threatened or harmed in any way? I mean this sincerely. If the 9/11 conspirators are willing to kill 3,000 Americans, wouldn't they stop at nothing to silence those who might risk their secrets???


Thanks,

A Disbeliever
Top
Reprieval
Posted: Sep 20 2006, 11:44 PM


Unregistered









QUOTE (disbeliever @ Sep 20 2006, 04:09 AM)
Loose Change raises many questions that haven't been adequately explored in the mainstream media and they certainly deserve to be examined;

However, to believe that there was a conspiracy involving government personnel, I need some general answers to a few questions:

When was this conspiracy hatched?

Were the attacks on WTC in 93, the bombs in the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, the attack on the USS Cole, planned and executed by the 9/11 conspirators?

Are Al Qaeda real? (i.e. do they have independent goals, plans and actions or are they now (or always been) a US fiction or client)?

How many people (and agencies within the Government) do you think were involved in the planning, execution and cover-up of the conspiracy (100??? 1,000??? 10,000)???

How come Bush and Co (as nefarious as they might be) couldn't keep the NSA wire-taps and data mining, the "Black Sites", the "Extraordinary Rendition", etc, secret for very long and yet no one person in the 9/11 conspiracy has come forward or leaked info???

Why, if these conspirators can plot, plan, and execute 9/11, couldn't they plant evidence of WMD's in Iraq?

Why would the conspirators shoot a missile into the Pentagon instead of using a commerical airplane as they did in the 3 other crashes? Why risk people seeing/filming a fighter plane shooting a missile?

If the cell phone calls were fakes, how could they have pulled this off convincingly? Among other things, the 9/11 conspirators would have to get the names of passengers off flight lists - presumably with 2 weeks or less notice - find out their cell phone numbers, the numbers of their loved ones, get a reasonable facsimile of their voice, and then fool close relatives and friends with authentic sounding messages? And, of course, why go through this trouble of faking cell phone messages at all??? Why make fake cell phone calls and risk exposure by independent investigators like those in Loose Change???

Lastly, why haven't the makers of Loose Change been threatened or harmed in any way? I mean this sincerely. If the 9/11 conspirators are willing to kill 3,000 Americans, wouldn't they stop at nothing to silence those who might risk their secrets???


Thanks,

A Disbeliever

First, The conspiracy................was hatched.......IDK when, you'd have to ask Dylan.

Second, Probably not.

Third, Yes, Al Qaeda is very much real. WTF kinda stupid question is that? IDK what they have going, I'm not apart of Al Qaeda.

Fourth, As many as was needed. I'd estimate about a couple hundred.

Fifth and sixth, I'll let someone else answer that.

Seventh, There's no way they could fly a plane that low, he'd have to be an extroadinary, amazing, out of this universe pilot. besides, the plane would have been f*cked up when it hit the light poles, and it would have crashed on the ground. Besides, they don't care what people say, because no one would believe them because they all believe the governments lies.

Eigth, finding out the names of the passengers wouldn't take more than a few hours. Why would you need their cell phone number? You can use *67 and it'll block your call. The reciever won't be able to know who is calling with caller ID. Being the government as they are, they can find anyone's phone number. It's like saying they can't find our Social security numbers. In LC, in mexico, or somewhere like that, they found technology that can clone a person's voice, incase you didn't watch that far.

Ninth, this is AMERICA! IDIOT! We're allowed to express our opinions, it's in the first amendment you f*cking jackass. Taking them out would only mean the government is afraid they'd expose them too much and they have to take them out.

View both sides of the arguement before you judge, you close-minded fool.
Top
s8junkie
Posted: Sep 21 2006, 01:12 AM


Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Member No.: 5,051
Joined: 11-September 06



Here's the biggest hole of all. Why weren't the hijackers Irqai. Why were no Iraqi passports found? Do I hear a conspiracy theory imploding?
Top
Reprieval
Posted: Sep 21 2006, 01:23 AM


Unregistered









9 hijackers turned up alive, who said they were Iraqi, the government?? why should we believe them? And did we not find one passport? I believe we did.
Top
sleepy2k16
Posted: Sep 21 2006, 01:55 AM


Advanced Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 307
Member No.: 4,453
Joined: 26-August 06



1. Insider Trading
2. Thermite
3. Northwoods
4. Pull it
5. Pentagon
Top
gum
Posted: Oct 5 2006, 01:59 PM


Member
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 29
Member No.: 6,122
Joined: 5-October 06



Hi all of ya,


QUOTE
Why, if these conspirators can plot, plan, and execute 9/11, couldn't they plant evidence of WMD's in Iraq?


I read or heard a few years back, well during the invasion of Irak, obviously.
That a senior member of the army resigned in disgust because he had been asked to plant a (or several?) nuclear bomb in Irak to justify the WMD theory.
Now this is old memory but I definitely didn't dream it up, maybe my info was wrong but it does deserve a bit of investigating.

And to answer those who just can't believe their government capable of killing or letting american people die!
Don't forget Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt apparently had foreknowledge of the Japanese strike TWELWE DAYS beforehand, and he let it happen. Why? because he needed civilian backing for US participation in WWII, that's a fact.

There are many, many other examples in history (including US history) that prove that governements can go to great lengths, an commit real crimes against their own populations just to serve political objectives.
Top
« Next Oldest | The LC Lounge | Next Newest »

Topic OptionsPages: (3) 1 2 [3] 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1242 seconds | Archive