Make It Stick
J. Liberal
Posted: Sep 9 2006, 11:19 AM


Newbie
Group Icon

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Member No.: 4,861
Joined: 9-September 06



And what I mean is don't let THEM poke so many holes in your argument.

1) Cite multiple experts. Anyone can find one guy that will go out on a limb to support a conspiracy theory.

I just saw a much more convincing program on the Discovery Channel on the twin towers, "Anatomy of a Collapse." They cited experts, several of them.

Needless to say, I'm not buying the "explosives stashed in the building" portion of your theory.

2) Dig Deeper. You brought up interesting points that I have never heard: Marvin Bush's role, the call to the San Francisco mayor the day before, the flight cancellations of military flag officers, and the continued use of the United side numbers. Why not ask someone about it (multiple sources)instead of leading us to believe it had to be a conspiracy? All this evidence is intriguing, but without more research, it still is nothing more than a lot of inconsistencies.

I saw this movie for the first time this last weekend. Again, I thought it was compelling, but it falls far short of convincing. Let's face it, after these last few years, we know that our government is capable of doing some pretty heinous stuff. But I am more likely to say that the Bush administration is incompetent than brilliant. And it would take a brilliant mind to pull this off as an inside job. Conspiracies are not impossible, but a conspiracy of this sort would be near impossible. The biggest question would be: How many people would have to be involved? I'm sure most people could not answer this, but one would have to think it would have to be hundreds, if not thousands of people, spanning the FBI, CIA, NSA, FAA, military, as well as the President and his advisors. All these people, many of whom would have nothing to gain from supporting such a plan. All these people who would have to go to sleep every night with 3000+ dead souls on their conscience. Somebody would be bound to come clean.

So, in short, although an interesting movie, I need a lot more proof that this was the greatest conspiracy the world has ever known.
Top
Avenger
Posted: Sep 9 2006, 02:42 PM


Regular Member
Group Icon

Group: Debate
Posts: 141
Member No.: 1,144
Joined: 10-April 06



QUOTE
And what I mean is don't let THEM poke so many holes in your argument.

Kinda hard to poke holes in questions. You can either answer or you can't. Seems to me it's the "conspiracy theorists" who are poking holes in the official line.
QUOTE
1) Cite multiple experts. Anyone can find one guy that will go out on a limb to support a conspiracy theory.

Joseph M. Phelps (FM)
Structural Dynamicist Charter Member, Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers

Jean-Pierre Petit (FM)
Aeronautics, astrophysics, engineering

Doyle Winterton (FM)
Civil Engineering Structural Engineering

Frank Carmen (AM)
Physics Ph.D., BYU

Eric Douglas (AM)
New York City architect Chair of the Independent Peer Review Committe for the NIST WTC Reports at nistreview.org
http://www.nistreview.org/

Joel Ferrell (AM)
Pilot, Aeronautical engineer, physics911.net/spine.htm
http://physics911.net/spine.htm

Patrick Gallagher (AM)
Mechanical engineer

Michael Gass (AM)
Air Force Explosive Ordnance, Disposal Specialist, Bomb disposal technician

Kenyon Gibson (AM)
Former US Naval Intelligence, author of "Common Sense: A Study of the Bushes, the CIA and the Suspicions Regarding 9/11" (2003, in Arabic) and of "Hemp for Victory" (2006)

Rodger Herbst (AM)
777 and 787 Aeronautics, Flight Controls and Simulation Engineering

Guy Razer (AM)
Lieutenant Colonel, USAF Retired

Rein A. Roos (AM)
Airborne Dust and Aerosol Specialist

Gordon Ross (AM)
Mechanical engineering, Production engineering
http://worldtradecentertruth.com/Journal_5_PTransferRoss.pdf

Kevin Ryan (AM)
Former Site Manager for Environmental Health Laboratories, a division of Underwriters Laboratories

Tom Spellman (AM)
Civil engineering, architecture, non-profits, activism

Glenn Stanish (AM)
Airline Pilot, Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), Allied Pilots Association (APA)

Ken Wrenn (AM)
Civil engineer

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/WhoAreWe.html



QUOTE
I just saw a much more convincing program on the Discovery Channel on the twin towers, "Anatomy of a Collapse." They cited experts, several of them.

Needless to say, I'm not buying the "explosives stashed in the building" portion of your theory.

So what are you buying? The pancake theory? Even NIST doesn't buy that one. And in case you missed it the first time-
http://worldtradecentertruth.com/Journal_5_PTransferRoss.pdf

QUOTE
2) Dig Deeper. You brought up interesting points that I have never heard: Marvin Bush's role, the call to the San Francisco mayor the day before, the flight cancellations of military flag officers, and the continued use of the United side numbers. Why not ask someone about it (multiple sources)instead of leading us to believe it had to be a conspiracy? All this evidence is intriguing, but without more research, it still is nothing more than a lot of inconsistencies.

I think the near-symmetrical collapse of a 47 story building in 6.6 seconds is more than an inconsistency. Can you explain it? NIST and FEMA can't. Can you explain people, concrete, office furniture, and carpet being converted to fine dust?
http://www.environews.com/Features/dust_WTC.htm
Can you explain gravel-sized bone fragments on the roof of the Deutsche Bank building?
http://www.1010wins.com/pages/25011.php?
Top
« Next Oldest | Loose Change Final Cut | Next Newest »

Topic Options



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1361 seconds | Archive