A Real Way To Disprove Official Theory

Someone with deep pockets buys land out somewhere in the middle of nowhere, say Utah. Rebuild one of the twin towers. Fly a (EMPTY) plane into it filled with the same speed, approach and amount of fuel that the plane on 911 had. Sit back and watch for the "collapse". Obviously, there would be no collapse.

Sadly, this idea is probably far fetched and will never happen.

I think about that every day. We should find some investors and donors for such a project.

Rebuild it in another country ( I guess the gov would prevent it in the US ).

And then fly an empty 767 into it, no collapse and then hit it with another 767!

that's a huge project - I was thinking rebuild the section of the pentagon and do the same.. would be less exepensive, but still pretty damn expensive... I'm sure Hugo Chavez would do it though!

I've thought of this too. If they re-created the structure it would tell a lot. Maybe a government that has doubts would fund a project like this eventually if the world gets too bad. years from now though.

Heres $2,000,000,000 for the project....

How about scaling it down to about 10 meters.

I was thinking about the exact same thing - of course we would need to build a tower to the exact specifications of the WTC. Maybe if i get lucky next time in Vegas i'll set the wheels in motion on this one!

honestly, if i had the money to do such a thing - i'd build a bunker and wait for the shit to hit the fan.. if it were an inside job, and the truth were coming out - WWIII (or IV or whatever) would probably happen anyway... unless it can come out quick enough to clear out the corrupt powers before they could actually trigger it.

but yeah, build a bunker with that cash.

The best and cheapest way would be to take a remote controlled 757 and nosedive it into some ground, preferably near Shanksville Pa. If the plane disappears, then the offical story is true. Simple.

you only need to build the top 20 floors and collapse at #10.

by the assumption of a pancake collapse/whatever and the fact that the initial falling 'block' needs to get an initial speed of 8.6 m/s by falling 3.7 m 20 floors are enough for the test. I think that in that case the frame will even be weaker (who on earth believes that) because of the buffer effect of conducting materials, the heat has less chance to conduct away. If it then stands -> disprove

Problems is that you have to do it a couple of times to get a realistic statistical value.

Forget it, this will never happen and can't never be done, there is no hope I'm afraid we have to stick at the official theory.

I like this idea, the hard part would be finding all the same materials and building plans.

The building plans you could get. Putting together a exact dulicate of the WTC...priceless.

I hear what you're saying. We've already disproven the official story but the average American is too stupid to see that.

That was what I was thinking, try scaling it down. but then surely that wouldnt make it 100% accurate.