Wtc 7 Technical Approach / Status Summary, Oct 12, 2006, Therese McAllister, NIST

Presentation: "WTC 7 Technical Approach and Status Summary", October 12, 2006, Therese McAllister, NIST

http://wtc.nist.gov/media/WTC7_Approach_Summary12Oct06.pdf

Very interesting.

Document says that NIST will include blast damage (maybe with the use of thermite) as a possible initiating event for the total collapse of WTC7.

Also says that they just got new photos of the south face of WTC7 in August 2006. Hmm... show show!

I notice that CDI (Controlled Demolition, Inc.) is a subcontractor for "analysis of hypothetical blast events and assistance with structural analysis of inititiating events".

I'm worried that they're going to think of some potentially plausable argument that won't technically answer all the questions, but all the while using it as the official legitemate account...and people will "lap it up".

I'm also curious if they officially declare it because of the fires and impact of debris, because if they do, then they have to explain how fires that are not hot enough to destroy buildings are capable of bringing down skyscrapers, AND why WTC buildings 5, 6, etc. All suffered the same fate, some even WORSE from "falling" debris (more like "Launched out of a cannon") yet stood up with no problem.

...I can hear it now...."Well, those buildings were more box-shaped and WTC 1, 2 & 7 were tall rectangles which caused too much weight fluctuations....etc etc etc". But then I guess we'd have to stop building tall skyscrapers since FIRE can destroy them all.

They are looking at the explosives possibility because there is so much public interest in it now due to movies like Loose Change. So many people never saw Building 7 fall. They were probably hoping they could sweep this under the rug.

But regardless theres no way they will determine it was explosives. Even if it was, they will never come to that conclusion. I think they will find some sort of explanation, and use a bunch of technical terms to make it sound legit and that will be the end of it.

There is no way NIST is going to come to the conclusion of thermate and nano thermite being used. They are going to blame the fuel and loss of fireproofing from debris on the collapse. Just like the WTC 1/2..

MJ

hey what is that... NIST and CD ?

It is just a matter of time folks, the show has just began.

NIST should be the National Institute for Standards and Technologies, CD stands for controlled demolition.

Thanks, I know that but I mean that they now look at CD, they rejected it as far as I know.