View Full Version: Isi Involvment 9/11

Loose Change Forum > Investigate 9/11 > Isi Involvment 9/11


Title: Isi Involvment 9/11
Description: ISI


Reggie_perrin - October 8, 2006 12:34 PM (GMT)
Ive been doing research on 9/11 for some time now and it seems the ISI (pakistani secret service) keep croping up, i don't think there involvment in 9/11 can be underestimated.Some recent events have also hardened my belief that they had a hand in the attacks, it has just been reported that the ISI were behind a bombing in mumbai which killed 186 people on a train, also i don't know if many people have been following the recent "liquid bomb plot" but one of the accused declined to give evidence on the basis that he feared that if he revealed what he knew the ISI would target his family, he said, and i qoute " i think they(isi) are scared at what i might reveal" he also said that t hey had been in touch with his family and thretened them.

It's also important to not that the ISI was created by the CIA, it's pretty there arm of the CIA in Pakistan.

The London bombers also have links to Pakistan, they supposedly made there marydom videos there.

Reggie_perrin - October 8, 2006 12:44 PM (GMT)

Reggie_perrin - October 8, 2006 12:49 PM (GMT)
also an article by Micheal Meacher from 2004, Micheal Meacher is an ex member of Tony Blairs cabinet, he's gone public in his questioning of the official 9/11 story.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1266520,00.html

Barcoded - October 8, 2006 01:12 PM (GMT)
Theres some interview things with 'Meacher in TerrorStorm, he seems like a good man and im glad he is a truther.

Reggie_perrin - October 8, 2006 02:02 PM (GMT)
he is also in the very good documentary, 'oil smoke and mirrors', watch it here, it links the impending peak oil crisis with 9/11, 9/11 has given America the green light to invade countries rich in oil, since 9/11 America has began to geopolotically position itself in the middle east where all the oil is, once it has control of the distibution of oil then it's mission accomplished.But 9/11 was a multi faceted psy-op, it has enabled the Bush admin to invade oil rich countries and on the other hand has enabled them to crush the consititution and set up a police state in America.

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=...oke+and+mirrors

jmb597 - October 8, 2006 02:25 PM (GMT)
I couldn't agree more. Pakistan ISI is also the route I have taken through my research. Thanks for the info!

Reggie_perrin - October 8, 2006 02:36 PM (GMT)
I think the London bombers were unwitting acomplises to an MI5/6/ISI set up, on the day of 7/7 there were terror drills being carried out on the EXACT same stations that the bombs went off, now were the 7/7 bombers employed to take part in the drill and told the explosives were fake? they could have been told they wanted to test out the undergounds security to see if the system would pick up on the "bombs".I remember one of the bomber went a stray and set off his bomb on a bus, was this why early reports were saying it was an 'electical surge' and not suicide bombs? so that the bomber that had gone a stray didn't realize he was being framed? remember he went into a mcdonalds before getting onto the bus, why didn't he detonate it in there?

Although marydom videos were found they never mention bombing British targets and family and friends of the bombers said they were much younger in the videos and they were probaby from a few years ealier.

Non of the bombers fit with typical sucicide bombers, they had good jobs, pregnant wives, they played cricket the night before the attacks.

KADrummer6 - October 8, 2006 03:03 PM (GMT)
watch the video "9/11: Press For Truth". That video shows at the very least the financial connection the ISI had with 9/11 and how we were covertly funding money to the ISI during the Soviet/Afghan War.

Coincidently, Saudi Arabia was also in on that funding. I've always wondered this question: could that have been some of the 30-or-so pages that were removed from the 9/11 Commission Report by the Gov't. If so, how much do you want to bet the ISI connection might have been talked about in the Commission as well but were taken out?

Remember, the ISI link is easily discussed since we have decades of news articles and reports about our CIA connection to them. That's probably why whenever it gets talked about in the news, the Gov't just completely ignored the issue and moved on.

Hard to dispute and spin evidence that's been widely known to the public for years. Luckily for the Gov't, our public is pretty lazy and complacent, so I would be willing to agree that our Gov't banked on that on this issue.

So far, it seems to be working for them. But I think it's only a matter of time before the connections become too great to ignore.

(What I wouldn't give to see what those removed pages in the 9/11 commission report said).

Jimson Datura - October 8, 2006 03:39 PM (GMT)

mo fiya - October 8, 2006 03:53 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (KADrummer6 @ Oct 8 2006, 11:03 AM)
If so, how much do you want to bet the ISI connection might have been talked about in the Commission as well but were taken out?

well considering the commission omitted from the report the fact that ISI Director Mahmoud Ahmed ordered the $100,000 wire transfer to Atta, i would say they probably talked about it.

THE DECIDER - October 8, 2006 04:27 PM (GMT)
user posted image

mo fiya - October 8, 2006 05:40 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (THE DECIDER @ Oct 8 2006, 12:27 PM)
user posted image

i believe Goss belongs somewhere in there, no?

Reggie_perrin - October 14, 2006 07:04 PM (GMT)
Has anyone read Paul Thompsons terror timeline? you can check out what was being reported about the ISI before during and after 9/11 here is a link to the ISI timeline page , this Saeed Sheikh has links with the 9/11 attacks and lead hijacker Atta and the ISI.

I think the CIA used the ISI to help fund and facilitate the attacks

-------------------------------------------------------------------


TIMELINE.


http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/timelin...ne&startpos=100

February 6, 2002: Western Media Largely Ignores Links Between Saeed Sheikh, ISI, and 9/11
Pakistani police publicly name Saeed Sheikh and a Islamic militant group he belongs to, Jaish-e-Mohammed, as those responsible for reporter Daniel Pearlís murder. [Observer, 2/24/2002] In the next several months, at least 12 Western news articles mention Saeedís links to al-Qaeda [ABC News, 2/7/2002; Boston Globe, 2/7/2002; Associated Press, 2/24/2002; Los Angeles Times, 3/15/2002] , including his financing of 9/11 [New York Daily News, 2/7/2002; CNN, 2/8/2002; Associated Press, 2/9/2002; Guardian, 2/9/2002; Independent, 2/10/2002; Time, 2/10/2002; New York Post, 2/10/2002; Evening Standard, 2/12/2002; Los Angeles Times, 2/13/2002; New York Post, 2/22/2002; Sunday Herald (Glasgow), 2/24/2002; USA Today, 3/8/2002] , and at least 16 articles mention his links to the ISI. [Cox News Service, 2/21/2002; Observer, 2/24/2002; Daily Telegraph, 2/24/2002; Newsweek, 2/25/2002; New York Times, 2/25/2002; USA Today, 2/25/2002; National Post, 2/26/2002; Boston Globe, 2/28/2002; Newsweek, 3/11/2002; Newsweek, 3/13/2002; Guardian, 4/5/2002; MSNBC, 4/5/2002] However, many other articles fail to mention either link. Only a few articles consider that Saeed could have been connected to both groups at the same time [London Times, 2/25/2002; London Times, 4/21/2002; Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, 3/3/2002] , and apparently, only one of these mentions he could be involved in the ISI, al-Qaeda, and financing 9/11. [London Times, 4/21/2002] By the time Saeed is convicted of Pearlís murder in July 2002, Saeedís possible connections to al-Qaeda and/or the ISI are virtually unreported in US newspapers, while many British newspapers are still making one or the other connection.
Entity Tags: Jaish-e-Mohammed, al-Qaeda, Saeed Sheikh, Daniel Pearl, Pakistan Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence




* Hosted for free by InvisionFree