Considering the pancake theory offered by the 911 commission, stacking 110 stories of poured concrete flooring and supporting girders and furniture in a floor by floor collapse could never be dynamic to crush itself into the stack of debris evident at the end. If the floors were only one foot thick and the beams and sturdy office funiture beneath them all smashed flat to, say, four inches and there was no loss of density due to crumbling that would result in at least a 150 foot pile of debris, not counting material from the walls! There is no way, from the numerous pictures I saw of ground zero's aftermath that that big a pile of material is there. The exploded, pulverised furniture people and concrete blew all over the area. If the powder and dust distribution and thickness could be estimated, it could very well account for the missing material and proove explosive detonation.
The mere idea of missing material should be evidence enough to reopen the entire investigation, or at least definitely debunk the official fantasy.

NIST does not endorse the pancake theory. Pancaking is no longer the offical theory as it has been proven FALSE!

Then what's the official theory now?

I believe the official theory is along the lines of "Shut up and pay your taxes".

official theory is now

'we don't know but it certainly weren't bombs'

What was it? The wind maybe? [dunno]

EBS...exploding building syndrome

Ahhh... makes sense!

Let's not forget there were TWO 110 story buildings (next to each other) that supposedly collapsed. So, there should be 220 stories of debris. I'd like to know where the debris is too. It sure as hell ain't in any of the pictures I have seen.
My theory is high energy explosive device, such as small pure hydrogen nuke (leaves no radiation), was used in combination with other type demolition materials (thermite/thermate) and cutting charges. The nuke generated million degree heat... enough to draw all water from the concrete and to vaporize steel. That is why you don't see massive debris pile. It was vaporized into the atmosphere and into small micron sized particles of dust spread for miles around.

Here is a site indicating use of small hyrogen bombs:

http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/military.htm
(see links on bottom right side of page)

Some photos of WTC











[dunno]

When you look at the north tower collapse you see 4 phenomena

1) The top collapses like a 'normal' controlled demolition
2) squibs
3) a demolition wave that races downwards
4) three or four big booms that send large pieces of steel flying

What puzzles me the most is the big booms...you can clearly see that this is not a continuous process. Mini-nukes? Thermobarics? Nano-explosives?

In no way does it resemble a conventional demolition, it's much too energetic.

I'm busy mapping the squibs (times, floors) to see if there's a pattern there. One problem is that there's no footage from the southside. Noticed some strange flashes too that show up on different video sources [hmm]

NOVA's "pancake theory" debunked.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=weqBynRZGG8

Common sense and science are finally reconciled in this short video.