The facts about wtc being brought down by nukes is starting to come out. The information is all there. There is no other way to explain away the fallout particles found in the wtc dust by the USGS.
What I am afraid of is that a conventional nuke will be set off near or over ground zero that one everyone willl instantly recognise ie. giant flash, huge fireball, mushroom cloud to cover up all the evidence of nukes already used in and around the wtc.
IMHO, this is probably the plan, by the powers that be, if the public ever starts to question the use of nukes in demolishing the wtc. 1 2 and 7.
| QUOTE (lunk @ Sep 18 2006, 03:05 PM) |
The facts about wtc being brought down by nukes is starting to come out. The information is all there. There is no other way to explain away the fallout particles found in the wtc dust by the USGS.
What I am afraid of is that a conventional nuke will be set off near or over ground zero that one everyone willl instantly recognise ie. giant flash, huge fireball, mushroom cloud to cover up all the evidence of nukes already used in and around the wtc.
IMHO, this is probably the plan, by the powers that be, if the public ever starts to question the use of nukes in demolishing the wtc. 1 2 and 7. |
Yep. Probably small directed thermonuclear devices, of hydrogen type, used in WTC demolitions. Massive heat able to pulverize concrete and vaporize steel. Lots of signs indicate this.
America nuking its own people. Sick.
Now that you mention it, it does look like a nuke attack...
but then again, wouldn't the effects from the fall-out be more obvious and clear?