View Full Version: Would?

Haven Of Wiidom > Chit-Chat > Would?


Title: Would?


Bandit - March 29, 2009 09:57 PM (GMT)
Would you rather travel to the past or future? also, why?

videogameman - March 29, 2009 10:04 PM (GMT)
Past. I could save Martin Luther King Jr, Abe Lincoln, etc. I could change the future. WAIT! What if there's time machines in the future? Then i could do both!

Pseudonym - March 29, 2009 10:12 PM (GMT)
Past, I could bringeth a machine gun to Carthage and be like. "Take this to the romans."

Bandit - March 29, 2009 10:12 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Pseudonym @ Mar 29 2009, 10:12 PM)
Past, I could bringeth a machine gun to Carthage and be like. "Take this to the romans."

One machine gun? :huh: Seriously?

:P

Jailer411 - March 29, 2009 10:14 PM (GMT)
Future, because I'm likely to ruin the present if I go to the past, unless I was meant to go to the past in the first place. That way, me not going to the past might ruin the present as well.

Pseudonym - March 29, 2009 10:15 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Bandit @ Mar 29 2009, 10:12 PM)
One machine gun? :huh: Seriously?

:P

Yes, that'd help TREMENDOUSLY!

No one is wearing any kind f Body armor. Use Machine gun + Cathaginian army + Hannibal's genius.

Romans get summarily ruined.

Jailer411 - March 29, 2009 10:17 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Pseudonym @ Mar 29 2009, 04:15 PM)
QUOTE (Bandit @ Mar 29 2009, 10:12 PM)
One machine gun?  :huh: Seriously?

:P

Yes, that'd help TREMENDOUSLY!

No one is wearing any kind f Body armor. Use Machine gun + Cathaginian army + Hannibal's genius.

Romans get summarily ruined.

One machine gun won't help in the long run. Unless he shot the head of the opposing side.

nicker - March 29, 2009 10:17 PM (GMT)
If the past is screwed there would be no future anyway so I would just stay where I am.

Guardian of Nesh - March 29, 2009 10:19 PM (GMT)
Well, it doesn't really matter which you travel to; it'll still screw stuff up. If You travel to the future you'll accept the "outcome" and become complacient and not do the work you need to. Thus, you prevent the outcome. If you change anything in the past it just creates an alternate universe that you wouldn't see the outcome of, if you believe some theories or you just create a paradox that destroys everything. However if I could just change my own timeline, I'd go to the past withe my knowledge and prevent some situations.

Jailer411 - March 29, 2009 10:20 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Guardian of Nesh @ Mar 29 2009, 04:19 PM)
Well, it doesn't really matter which you travel to; it'll still screw stuff up. If You travel to the future you'll accept the "outcome" and become complacient and not do the work you need to. Thus, you prevent the outcome. If you change anything in the past it just creates an alternate universe that you wouldn't see the outcome of, if you believe some theories or you just create a paradox that destroys everything. However if I could just change my own timeline, I'd go to the past withe my knowledge and prevent some situations.

What if you were meant to go to the past/future? You could mess things up by not going like you were intended to.

Guardian of Nesh - March 29, 2009 10:28 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Jailer411 @ Mar 29 2009, 05:20 PM)
What if you were meant to go to the past/future? You could mess things up by not going like you were intended to.

By going and doing someting you eliminate the want/need to do said thing and therefore don't do it and create the want/need again. This is called a paradox.

treacherous - March 30, 2009 12:55 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Bandit @ Mar 29 2009, 10:12 PM)
One machine gun? :huh: Seriously?

:P

He'd be having a great time for a few minutes until the first clip or whatever runs out and he has to reload. Then here comes a well aimed arrow right between the eyes.

The Ripper - March 30, 2009 02:20 AM (GMT)
Allow me to take a third option: Neither. If the timeline is messed up, then a paradox would occur, making the timeline screwed up to a point that it would collapse!

MarvelFan15 - March 30, 2009 03:59 AM (GMT)
...Future.

If I traveled to the past...Well: ((Samuri}}

GruntKilla06 - March 30, 2009 05:03 AM (GMT)
Past. Much easier to rule that way... puredevilishevil!!!

granobulax - March 30, 2009 02:50 PM (GMT)
Neither. If you change the past, it changes the present and if you change the future, it changes the futures' future.




Hosted for free by zIFBoards