InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.

Learn More · Sign-up for Free
Welcome to Cyber Nations Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE.
PLEASE GO TO http://forums.cybernations.net FOR THE CURRENT CYBER NATIONS FORUM.

Pages: (4) 1 2 [3] 4  ( Go to first unread post )

:. NATO Terms of Surrender for the ALMEA alliance
Priamos
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 02:37 PM


Private First Class
*

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Member No.: 38,315
Joined: 1-September 07



QUOTE (tmwest70 @ Sep 1 2007, 02:35 PM)
[QUOTE]

No take it or leave it.

can you please answer to my request?
cool3atool does not speak for ALMEA single!


--------------------
---------Priamos-ALMEA-Minister-of-Interior-Affairs---------
Top
IronSoldier820
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 02:42 PM


Richard For The Win!
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6,343
Member No.: 17,171
Joined: 25-November 06



180 days. Thats half a year, and in CN, thats pretty darn long. Considering, these terms are pretty ridiculous. Lower it to 90 days or something.


--------------------
user posted image

QUOTE (jamesbodden @ Jul 28 2007, 10:20 PM)
Its because GGA's milkshake brings all the boys to the yard and their like its better than yours and Damn right its better than yours and They could teach but they don't want you touching their milkshake so hands off
Top
buller
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 02:52 PM


ME > YOU | I R RITE
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1,255
Member No.: 13,762
Joined: 20-October 06



Do you feel a rouse when you do ridiculus things like this? how are any of those terms needed except the NAP between ALMEA and CATS?


--------------------
user posted image

Note: Views expressed may not represent anybody or anything.
Top
tmwest70
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 02:52 PM


NATO PRESIDENT
*

Group: Members
Posts: 130
Member No.: 10,443
Joined: 24-August 06



QUOTE (Priamos @ Sep 1 2007, 02:37 PM)
[QUOTE=tmwest70,Sep 1 2007, 02:35 PM] [QUOTE]

No take it or leave it. [/QUOTE]
can you please answer to my request?
cool3atool does not speak for ALMEA single!

[QUOTE]

the terms are the terms.
take them or fight.

Come to the nato forums if want to talk.

NATO is done talking about this.


--------------------
user posted image


Top
smallfrog
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 02:53 PM


Colonel
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2,916
Member No.: 31,585
Joined: 4-May 07



QUOTE (Priamos @ Sep 1 2007, 02:35 PM)
QUOTE (smallfrog @ Sep 1 2007, 02:28 PM)
QUOTE (Priamos @ Sep 1 2007, 02:18 PM)
i hope you understand that the situation inside ALMEA is more than chaotic right now, so we need time to concentrate again. a final yes or no on your terms of surrender can first be given, if we have established a capable exicutive.

as long, i beg you to agree on these 5 provisional understandings!

I know what can happen in an alliance when things go bad. I have been there twice. And I just call that an excuse.

If you want some advice, one person needs to assume command and make a decision.

the problem is right now we have 3 people that want to "assume command and make a decision"... makes it a little hard.

therefore i want some time so we can re-organize.

Given you have a very simple choice ahead of you and it just takes a decisive leader to do it, with or without the approval of his colleagues, I still don't buy your story. I've seen it done once, and done it myself once. So please just stop pretending you've ot issues and act. Its in your best interests.


--------------------
Chancellor of CNE


Top
TheDave
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 02:53 PM


Aqua <3
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1,095
Member No.: 25,875
Joined: 16-February 07



cool3atool; really...

I made the second reply in this thread somewhat mocking of the first two points.

It now appears they want them to stand for only 180 days.

None of your nations are currently even Nuke capable. YOU won't be nuke capable by the time 180 days is up. Just take them now before they see it 280 days before you have nukes.


--------------------
QUOTE
There is hardly anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price only are this man's lawful prey.
Ruskin

Land of Dave
LUBE yourself up
Aqua section for Trade, Donation and Tech Deals.
Top
Priamos
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 02:56 PM


Private First Class
*

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Member No.: 38,315
Joined: 1-September 07



QUOTE (tmwest70 @ Sep 1 2007, 02:52 PM)
[QUOTE=Priamos,Sep 1 2007, 02:37 PM] [QUOTE=tmwest70,Sep 1 2007, 02:35 PM] [QUOTE]

No take it or leave it. [/QUOTE]
can you please answer to my request?
cool3atool does not speak for ALMEA single! [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]

the terms are the terms.
take them or fight.

Come to the nato forums if want to talk.

NATO is done talking about this.

i would love to, but im not permitted to use the ALMEA embassy there


--------------------
---------Priamos-ALMEA-Minister-of-Interior-Affairs---------
Top
IronSoldier820
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 02:59 PM


Richard For The Win!
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6,343
Member No.: 17,171
Joined: 25-November 06



QUOTE (TheDave @ Sep 1 2007, 03:53 PM)
cool3atool; really...

I made the second reply in this thread somewhat mocking of the first two points.

It now appears they want them to stand for only 180 days.

None of your nations are currently even Nuke capable. YOU won't be nuke capable by the time 180 days is up. Just take them now before they see it 280 days before you have nukes.

Only 180 days? Are you mad?


--------------------
user posted image

QUOTE (jamesbodden @ Jul 28 2007, 10:20 PM)
Its because GGA's milkshake brings all the boys to the yard and their like its better than yours and Damn right its better than yours and They could teach but they don't want you touching their milkshake so hands off
Top
atreidesphalanx
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 03:04 PM


I had this avatar first.
*

Group: Members
Posts: 179
Member No.: 28,069
Joined: 11-March 07



The way ALMEA handled itself throughout this ordeal just shows that their leaders are not ready to assume the responsibility to lead nor protect its membership.


--------------------
My Nation

TAB Member! =)
Top
Bob Janova
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 03:04 PM


Yorkshireman
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2,479
Member No.: 14,904
Joined: 3-November 06



Meh, I guess it's not too bad for being attacked. I'd take these like that *snaps fingers* if I were you, ALMEA. It's not like you're close to nuclear capability anyway, in all honesty you likely won't be for 180 days anyway in your alliance so I wouldn't worry about that. Having to pay reps and admit responsibility is a bit of a slap round the face considering only NATO have got the military kit out, but just take it and complain about it in private is my advice.


--------------------
Seria (Green Team/a Grämlin)
On the Green Team? Join us at our team forums!
The Grämlins – visit #gremlins on IRC or visit the Grämlins forums
Grämlins Now Accepting Applicants! ... visit the forums to apply!
Minister for Foreign Affairs for the 4th Kingdom
25/5/07 – Remember the Viridian Entente always
Top
TheDave
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 03:07 PM


Aqua <3
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1,095
Member No.: 25,875
Joined: 16-February 07



QUOTE (IronSoldier820 @ Sep 1 2007, 09:59 PM)
QUOTE (TheDave @ Sep 1 2007, 03:53 PM)
cool3atool; really...

I made the second reply in this thread somewhat mocking of the first two points.

It now appears they want them to stand for only 180 days.

None of your nations are currently even Nuke capable. YOU won't be nuke capable by the time 180 days is up. Just take them now before they see it 280 days before you have nukes.

Only 180 days? Are you mad?

I'd answer your question, if you were a little more direct in determing what on earth you are hinting at


--------------------
QUOTE
There is hardly anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price only are this man's lawful prey.
Ruskin

Land of Dave
LUBE yourself up
Aqua section for Trade, Donation and Tech Deals.
Top
JoshuaR
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 03:09 PM


MFO Commander
*

Group: Members
Posts: 96
Member No.: 20,746
Joined: 27-December 06



These actually seem like fair terms. As your nations become nuclear eligible, you could go back to diplomacy and see if you can get the 180 days reduced for good behavior.


--------------------
-JoshuaR of Chana (MFO Alliance Leader aka Cobra Commander)
MFO

I am interested in buying $20 donations for $3million. PM me. (also other price level donations).
Top
Al Gore111
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 03:17 PM


*.:::Istari of DUAL:::.*
*

Group: Members
Posts: 265
Member No.: 38,074
Joined: 29-August 07



Cool3atool you are alright DUAL offer you sanctuary but seriousely we recommend you accept those surrender terms, they are good :D!


--------------------
*..::DUALwesome::..*
JOIN DUAL thats right : Defenders of Unity And Light
We party hard biggrin.gif


-98% of all teens have tried breathing oxygen. If you are one of the 2% who haven't, cut and paste this into your signature.
QUOTE ((Sir BluJohn @ Sep 1 2007 @ 11:04 PM))
One question. A 300 NS hippy nation is going to protect me how?

Top
Dark Fox Demon
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 03:26 PM


Private First Class
*

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Member No.: 29,095
Joined: 23-March 07



Harsh terms are required in this case. But 180 is stupid. I would say for 2-3 months they are under the control of NATO, but with these terms, you might as well own the alliance.


--------------------
Head Director of the Harmless Intelligence Agency.

--Proud Member of MHA
Top
IronSoldier820
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 08:42 PM


Richard For The Win!
*

Group: Members
Posts: 6,343
Member No.: 17,171
Joined: 25-November 06



QUOTE (TheDave @ Sep 1 2007, 04:07 PM)
QUOTE (IronSoldier820 @ Sep 1 2007, 09:59 PM)
QUOTE (TheDave @ Sep 1 2007, 03:53 PM)
cool3atool; really...

I made the second reply in this thread somewhat mocking of the first two points.

It now appears they want them to stand for only 180 days.

None of your nations are currently even Nuke capable. YOU won't be nuke capable by the time 180 days is up. Just take them now before they see it 280 days before you have nukes.

Only 180 days? Are you mad?

I'd answer your question, if you were a little more direct in determing what on earth you are hinting at

I'm not hinting at anything. I'm outright saying that 180 days is extremel long in any scenario. Period.


--------------------
user posted image

QUOTE (jamesbodden @ Jul 28 2007, 10:20 PM)
Its because GGA's milkshake brings all the boys to the yard and their like its better than yours and Damn right its better than yours and They could teach but they don't want you touching their milkshake so hands off
Top
IYIyTh
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 08:52 PM


NATO
*

Group: Members
Posts: 539
Member No.: 26,691
Joined: 24-February 07



QUOTE (IronSoldier820 @ Sep 1 2007, 09:42 PM)
QUOTE (TheDave @ Sep 1 2007, 04:07 PM)
QUOTE (IronSoldier820 @ Sep 1 2007, 09:59 PM)
QUOTE (TheDave @ Sep 1 2007, 03:53 PM)
cool3atool; really...

I made the second reply in this thread somewhat mocking of the first two points.

It now appears they want them to stand for only 180 days.

None of your nations are currently even Nuke capable. YOU won't be nuke capable by the time 180 days is up. Just take them now before they see it 280 days before you have nukes.

Only 180 days? Are you mad?

I'd answer your question, if you were a little more direct in determing what on earth you are hinting at

I'm not hinting at anything. I'm outright saying that 180 days is extremel long in any scenario. Period.

are you saying there havn't been harsher penalties meted out yet this is the first time you've spoken?
Interesting.


--------------------
*NATO*
Fyodor Dostoevsky had it right.
My Nation
.
current CDT General.
Top
Anu Drake
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 09:02 PM


Are you still a prophet if no one listens or remembers?
*

Group: Members
Posts: 377
Member No.: 28,198
Joined: 13-March 07



re: 180 days - what el bruc said earlier in the thread applies there.

The main point of all of this is that we said unconditional surrender and the first thing their quazi leadership does is give us completely different peace terms.

We've been trying in our forum to reach agreement, but it is just not happening.

/El Bruc for ALMEA President!


--------------------
"I predict that a year from now, GPA, BAPS, NpO, MK, & GATO will be beaten down in major wars.
GOONS, \m/, Atlantis, HoG, IAA, Sons of Muspel, NoV and a slew of others wont's exist.
NATO will be about the same size as it is now."
-Anu Drake

NATO Forum
Common Defense Treaty Forum
Top
Strawhat Luffy
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 09:18 PM


Captain of the Mugiwara Pirates
*

Group: Members
Posts: 420
Member No.: 30,261
Joined: 19-April 07



All the Almea leadership wannabes make my head hurt.

They seriously do need to reorganize or just disband. Srs.


Fair surrender terms though, NATO.


--------------------
Captain of the Mugiwara Pirates
Cybernations player since June 2006
My philosophy is "Power with people, not above them"
Member of the Siberian Tiger Alliance
Top
The Doombringer
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 09:29 PM


Sergeant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 69
Member No.: 15,772
Joined: 11-November 06



nice job! :popcorn:


--------------------




When the rich wage war
It’s the poor who die
Top
prince arutha
Posted: Sep 1 2007, 09:50 PM


Warrant Officer
*

Group: Members
Posts: 743
Member No.: 26,938
Joined: 27-February 07



QUOTE (Anu Drake @ Sep 1 2007, 09:02 PM)
re: 180 days - what el bruc said earlier in the thread applies there.

The main point of all of this is that we said unconditional surrender and the first thing their quazi leadership does is give us completely different peace terms.

We've been trying in our forum to reach agreement, but it is just not happening.

/El Bruc for ALMEA President!

El Bruc is too good for Almea.... Much like most other alliances in CN.


But it would be the best thing to have ever happend to Almea.


--------------------
Heir of Nueva Vida


"* Stop whining on the OWF about the consequences of your collective actions - it makes Baby Jesus cry" ~QUOTE (Malcolm Lee @ Jun 2 2007, 05:29 PM)
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you

Topic OptionsPages: (4) 1 2 [3] 4 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1270 seconds | Archive