InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.

Learn More · Register for Free
Welcome to Cyber Nations Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE.
PLEASE GO TO http://forums.cybernations.net FOR THE CURRENT CYBER NATIONS FORUM.

Pages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last » ( Go to first unread post )

:. Specific Military Dismisal
 
Should this be Implemented?
Yes [ 213 ]  [94.25%]
No [ 13 ]  [5.75%]
Total Votes: 226
  
amiles
  Posted on Feb 1 2007, 02:49 AM


Fan of Red Dwarf and Blackadder
*

Group: Members
Posts: 730
Member No.: 16,868
Joined: 21-November 06



You can make a specific military deployment, buy a specific amount of land or infrastructure but if you want to dismiss some of your military you need to get rid of at least a quarter of your soldiers. I just got a message saying my military was to overpowering after accepting foreign aid. I had to get rid of 2000 troops when I only needed to get rid of about 100. I wasted 190 strength and over $4,000. Imagine being a large nation and having to rid yourself of 10,000+ troops.

Come on does China just all of a sudden dismiss almost a million troops?

Also view the question as "get rid of drop down boxes"

This post has been edited by amiles on Feb 21 2007, 11:56 PM


--------------------
Top
Rejinx
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 02:53 AM


NATO Vice President
*

Group: Members
Posts: 377
Member No.: 19,255
Joined: 12-December 06



I try to keep my suggestions down to about 1 a week. That way I am not spmming the heck out of the forums and people are more likely to read my topic. Just an idea. ;)

This post has been edited by Rejinx on Feb 1 2007, 02:54 AM


--------------------
user posted image
NATO's ambassador to MHA and FCC
Top
Magsy
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 04:24 AM


Council President of ISCO
*

Group: Members
Posts: 496
Member No.: 10,764
Joined: 30-August 06



He has some ideas, so what? He's averaging 0.7 a day anyway. And not to be rude, but your post per day is nearly 5 times his.


--------------------
President Magee PSA PCC, Founder and Council President of ISCO.

Join ISCO now! Senior positions going quick! For more information, PM me now!!!

Better signature under construction.
Top
Snow Dan
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 04:29 AM


Religious Nut of the Answering Squad
Group Icon

Group: GPA
Posts: 2,578
Member No.: 12,536
Joined: 28-September 06



I also think that you should be able to dismiss both soldiers and tanks at the same time. Now you can only dismiss one or the other.


--------------------
Member of the Answering Squad
Ask King C How To Join The CN Forum Beaters
Pinned: REGARDING MULTIPLE USERS ON THE SAME NETWORK
Policy/Rules Change (Mar 14 2007)

Pinned: REQUIRED: READ THIS
if you are warned for cheating or your friend wants to play, etc
(May 5 2007)

My Nation: Siberius
Top
Rejinx
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 04:31 AM


NATO Vice President
*

Group: Members
Posts: 377
Member No.: 19,255
Joined: 12-December 06



QUOTE (Magsy @ Feb 1 2007, 04:24 AM)
He has some ideas, so what? He's averaging 0.7 a day anyway. And not to be rude, but your post per day is nearly 5 times his.

Just a suggestion.
my bad, I'll shut up <crying>


--------------------
user posted image
NATO's ambassador to MHA and FCC
Top
Hannibal Lecter
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 05:58 AM


King And Leader OF Narm
*

Group: Members
Posts: 343
Member No.: 13,868
Joined: 21-October 06



This game has been set to all people, we cannot just look at one nation and change it. the rest of CN nations are not complaining why should it change. I feel the Defect of this makes the game more challanging and more fun....why would you wanna play a game where you always win


--------------------
In times of war dont hope to kill a few.
Dont hope to see victory,
But hope to see the next day, alive

Hannibal Lecter
Leader of the Hybrid Angels


[center]user posted image[/center]

Quote(Smith)

Graceful acceptance of warning?
I can die a happy man.



Top
Snow Dan
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 10:07 AM


Religious Nut of the Answering Squad
Group Icon

Group: GPA
Posts: 2,578
Member No.: 12,536
Joined: 28-September 06



QUOTE (Hannibal Lecter @ Feb 1 2007, 10:58 PM)
This game has been set to all people, we cannot just look at one nation and change it. the rest of CN nations are not complaining why should it change. I feel the Defect of this makes the game more challanging and more fun....why would you wanna play a game where you always win

1) We are not just looking at one nation. We are looking at an aspect of the game, and suggesting an adjustment to how it works.

2) Maybe the rest of the CN players aren't complaining because the current system hasn't particulary bothered them, but that doesn't mean that they would be opposed to the change.

3) If you're opposed to this suggestion, then why haven't you voted "No"?

EDIT: This thread also discussed the idea of decomming specific numbers, and there were more people supporting it than opposing it.

This post has been edited by Snow Dan on Feb 1 2007, 10:33 AM


--------------------
Member of the Answering Squad
Ask King C How To Join The CN Forum Beaters
Pinned: REGARDING MULTIPLE USERS ON THE SAME NETWORK
Policy/Rules Change (Mar 14 2007)

Pinned: REQUIRED: READ THIS
if you are warned for cheating or your friend wants to play, etc
(May 5 2007)

My Nation: Siberius
Top
Master of the Spoons
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 05:03 PM


Controller of all things Spoon-Like
*

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Member No.: 10,731
Joined: 29-August 06



I doubt China would dismiss that many troops...but who knows.


--------------------
Member of The Five
Top
Comrade Federov
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 05:28 PM


GOLDen member..... and proud of it!
Group Icon

Group: GOLD
Posts: 89
Member No.: 23,536
Joined: 25-January 07



Personally the same thing happened to me. I think instead of a dropdown menu you specify dismissal just like soldier deployment


--------------------
Signature edited for Rules Violations
Top
Comrade Federov
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 05:45 PM


GOLDen member..... and proud of it!
Group Icon

Group: GOLD
Posts: 89
Member No.: 23,536
Joined: 25-January 07



Apparently people like this idea. Its unanamous


--------------------
Signature edited for Rules Violations
Top
grainsiloguard
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 06:04 PM


Wondering Dreamer
*

Group: Members
Posts: 210
Member No.: 21,863
Joined: 10-January 07



I've had this happen to me before. but you know what yeah its annoying and all but how much is a soldier. For me its $8.40 at defcon 5. sure 80 k for 10 k soldiers is alot but if you are that big thats chump change. I'm not flaming the idea I just think the current system is still sufficient.


--------------------
QUOTE
(Insert witty and endearing words here)

Atlantic Shadow Confederation wants you!!!!
Top
Anchova
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 06:12 PM


the bulldog of Valhalla
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1,714
Member No.: 22,048
Joined: 11-January 07



it's still unrealistic and unncessary... i just decommed 400 troops and bought back 200. why? irl that would never be the case.


--------------------


Valhalla! - apply today: http://forums.cnvalhalla.org/index.php!

QUOTE (WarriorConcept @ Aug 28 2007, 06:29 PM)
[20:28] <Helsbecter> MY HONOR IS ON THE LINE
[20:28] <Helsbecter> say that


MY HONOR IS ON THE LINE
Top
Namfuak
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 07:20 PM


Mr. Emo
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1,827
Member No.: 12,135
Joined: 21-September 06



It should definitly be a set amount, but there should be a number telling what the maximum troops you can dismiss before you go anarchy.


--------------------
QUOTE
QUOTE
Of course, that's why I don't understand the "God Hates Fags" campaign. If God loves everyone, the Bible says he does, and Jesus taught us to love each other, where do they get off?


"And the lord Jesus said to go out and love one another, BUT NOT IN THAT WAY EEWWW YOU SICKOS"
(First statement by FlameDarkfire, response by Seginus Temple)
Top
lyon s. kennedy
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 07:24 PM


Brigadier General
*

Group: Banned - Appeal Denied
Posts: 3,399
Member No.: 10,053
Joined: 19-August 06



Yeah make it like deployment.
Top
toichus maximus
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 08:56 PM


I'm Joining POONS right now
Group Icon

Group: GOLD
Posts: 477
Member No.: 16,321
Joined: 16-November 06



this would be excellent. I usually have to disband, then buy more troops to keep everyone happy 0.o


--------------------
I have always thought the actions of men the best interpreters of their thoughts~~John Locke
GOLD ALLIANCE OWNS MY SOUL (IN A GOOD WAY)
AKU SOKU ZAN--Evil unto evil
user posted image
Top
Spuddy
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 09:58 PM


Air Supply's Minister of Taking A Nuke In Teh Faec
*

Group: Members
Posts: 338
Member No.: 11,572
Joined: 12-September 06



I very much agree. Best idea today -- though that may be because this is the first Suggestion thread I've read today.


--------------------
Top
amiles
Posted on Feb 1 2007, 11:41 PM


Fan of Red Dwarf and Blackadder
*

Group: Members
Posts: 730
Member No.: 16,868
Joined: 21-November 06



I was also thinking you should also be able to buy a specific number of soldiers, CMs, Nukes and tech.

QUOTE
Come on does China just all of a sudden dismiss almost a million troops?


...And if they had conscription they would dismiss 40 million.

This post has been edited by amiles on Feb 5 2007, 12:50 AM


--------------------
Top
amiles
Posted on Feb 3 2007, 08:28 PM


Fan of Red Dwarf and Blackadder
*

Group: Members
Posts: 730
Member No.: 16,868
Joined: 21-November 06



bump (sry for the double post)


--------------------
Top
Leviathan XIII
Posted on Feb 3 2007, 10:38 PM


FAN Base Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1,432
Member No.: 10,766
Joined: 30-August 06



I suggested this a while back. I support this 100%.


--------------------
QUOTE
<Euroslavia> You guys should srsly surrender now.


QUOTE
<fellow14[fan]> mpol is like popeye the sailor man
Top
Bob Hoffenheimersons
Posted on Feb 4 2007, 06:37 AM


Sergeant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 60
Member No.: 20,400
Joined: 23-December 06



I support this. It should also be implemented for the purchase of soldiers as well as Tech.

Edit: And tanks, and CMs!!

This post has been edited by Bob Hoffenheimersons on Feb 4 2007, 06:39 AM


--------------------
Top
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you

Topic OptionsPages: (5) [1] 2 3 ... Last »



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1681 seconds | Archive