Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today. | Welcome to Cyber Nations Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit.
You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:
|
THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE. PLEASE GO TO http://forums.cybernations.net FOR THE CURRENT CYBER NATIONS FORUM.
:. Global Radiation
| PingPongPay |
|

IM GUNAH EET UR BRANEZ

Group: GPA
Posts: 704
Member No.: 4,933
Joined: 8-June 06

|
Nice addition. The environment hit shouldn't be too devestating (unless everyone goes crazy) and it adds realism. :J
However, I don't think CN will be seeing that +1 happiness bonus anytime soon. 10 nukes or less per month is probably going to be extremely (if not next to impossible) to reach, especially with rogues.
| QUOTE | | Hmmm....now the world needs to figure out how to keep people from using nukes... |
Maybe a nuclear council? Nations would apply to have permission from the council to use a nuke. If the council deems nuclear use appropriate then they could go ahead and use it. However, with rogues, such a council probably wouldn't work, and many people probably wouldn't even listen.
edit: spelling. Spelled nukes "nues".
This post has been edited by PingPongPay on Jul 12 2006, 12:33 PM
--------------------
|
|
|
| Btothex |
|

Staff Sergeant

Group: Banned - Appeal Denied
Posts: 171
Member No.: 6,381
Joined: 7-July 06

|
msot cool
--------------------
[IMG]http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/3676/bthead8ge.png[/IMG]
|
|
|
| Ragashingo |
|

Head of GATO Intelligence

Group: Members
Posts: 759
Member No.: 469
Joined: 18-February 06

|
With the number of nukes around its extremely unlikely that 10 won't be fired off in 30 days. This seems a bit overly harsh, maybe it should be like 40 - 50 nukes which would represent a real war instead of 10 which represents what passes for peace around here...
--------------------
| QUOTE | | [9:26pm] <Chris_Kaos> I'm from Canadian. |
|
|
|
| Hannibal1 |
|
Command Sergeant Major

Group: NPO
Posts: 269
Member No.: 3,583
Joined: 17-May 06

|
I lost half a star... I'm not perfect environment anymore. :(
At least i know others are suffering too... ROFLMAO
|
|
|
| GREATBAY |
|
Unregistered

|
I lost a dollar a day for each citizen in tax,5k less a day,I would see this as a permanent event...feel sorry for new nations have to pay so long for something they will probably never obtain.I wouldn't wait for too many hurrah's on this one.
|
|
|
| Rich333 |
|

This is Bob. Bob's going to eat your liver.

Group: Members
Posts: 2,135
Member No.: 3,806
Joined: 20-May 06

|
| QUOTE (Squintus @ Jul 12 2006, 02:24 PM) | | Try to think of it as a uniting force against rogues. |
And alliances which use nukes in retaliation against them.
--------------------
| QUOTE (Robert Heinlein @ The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress) | "Professor, your words sound good but there is something slippery about them. Too much power in the hands of individuals--surely you would not want ... well, H-missiles for example--to be controlled by one irresponsible person?"
"My point is that one person is responsible. Always. If H-bombs exist--and they do--some man controls them. In terms of morals there is no such thing as 'state.' Just men. Individuals. Each responsible for his own acts." |
|
|
|
| Letum |
|

Comrade Letum of the Novus Ordo Pacificus.

Group: NPO
Posts: 1,513
Member No.: 905
Joined: 10-March 06

|
Make it 1% instead of 2%....it is way too punishing as is...
--------------------
Then the earth shook and trembled; the foundations also of the hills moved and were shaken, because he was wroth. There went up a smoke out of his nostrils and fire out of his mouth devoured: coals were kindled by it. He bowed the heavens also, and came down: and darkness was under his feet. Letum is here.
|
|
|
| hubbird |
|

NOT International Communist Party

Group: Members
Posts: 215
Member No.: 6,527
Joined: 10-July 06

|
What about a global cap and trade system -- i.e. all nations agree to limit the global radiation level to .2, which means no more than 10 nukes per month. These could be doled out to the major alliances, or we could have a monthly inter-alliance auction of nuclear credits with the proceeds going to an inter-alliance aid fund to provide the resources to deal with rogues by using conventional weaponry rather than nuking them.
As to curbing rogue use of nukes -- what about giving them the option to sign a non-proliferation agreement as an individual nation?
Eager to hear others' thoughts.
This post has been edited by hubbird on Jul 12 2006, 12:45 PM
--------------------
Rogue scum.
|
|
|
| Kaiser Martens |
|

The Snake

Group: Members
Posts: 5,516
Member No.: 108
Joined: 9-February 06

|
>_> Damn, radiation SUX.
--------------------
| QUOTE | <CatCow[FAN]> NPO is Russia <CatCow[FAN]> GOONS are Germany <CatCow[FAN]> and we're Poland... |
Yah I'm back in NoV.
|
|
|
| Rich333 |
|

This is Bob. Bob's going to eat your liver.

Group: Members
Posts: 2,135
Member No.: 3,806
Joined: 20-May 06

|
This "improvement" sucks so long as the suggestion that it be based on the amount of total land in CN is not implemented along with it. The more land there is, the less effect radiation should have. The global radiation level is only going to continue rising, as the number of nations, and thus the number of nuclear-capable nations, increases.
I think the nation of the individual who came up with this idea should be knocked down to zero infra, along with anyone who has used a nuke in the past month. :angry:
--------------------
| QUOTE (Robert Heinlein @ The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress) | "Professor, your words sound good but there is something slippery about them. Too much power in the hands of individuals--surely you would not want ... well, H-missiles for example--to be controlled by one irresponsible person?"
"My point is that one person is responsible. Always. If H-bombs exist--and they do--some man controls them. In terms of morals there is no such thing as 'state.' Just men. Individuals. Each responsible for his own acts." |
|
|
|
| Rich333 |
|

This is Bob. Bob's going to eat your liver.

Group: Members
Posts: 2,135
Member No.: 3,806
Joined: 20-May 06

|
| QUOTE (Letum @ Jul 12 2006, 02:42 PM) | | Make it 1% instead of 2%....it is way too punishing as is... |
:J
--------------------
| QUOTE (Robert Heinlein @ The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress) | "Professor, your words sound good but there is something slippery about them. Too much power in the hands of individuals--surely you would not want ... well, H-missiles for example--to be controlled by one irresponsible person?"
"My point is that one person is responsible. Always. If H-bombs exist--and they do--some man controls them. In terms of morals there is no such thing as 'state.' Just men. Individuals. Each responsible for his own acts." |
|
|
|
| Rich333 |
|

This is Bob. Bob's going to eat your liver.

Group: Members
Posts: 2,135
Member No.: 3,806
Joined: 20-May 06

|
| QUOTE (Jeoshua @ Jul 12 2006, 02:32 PM) | | Awesome, love the new addition... :J |
I hope you get nuked by a rogue for that.
--------------------
| QUOTE (Robert Heinlein @ The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress) | "Professor, your words sound good but there is something slippery about them. Too much power in the hands of individuals--surely you would not want ... well, H-missiles for example--to be controlled by one irresponsible person?"
"My point is that one person is responsible. Always. If H-bombs exist--and they do--some man controls them. In terms of morals there is no such thing as 'state.' Just men. Individuals. Each responsible for his own acts." |
|
|
|
| Rich333 |
|

This is Bob. Bob's going to eat your liver.

Group: Members
Posts: 2,135
Member No.: 3,806
Joined: 20-May 06

|
| QUOTE (hubbird @ Jul 12 2006, 02:44 PM) | As to curbing rogue use of nukes -- what about giving them the option to sign a non-proliferation agreement as an individual nation?
Eager to hear others' thoughts. |
Really? You want to hear my thoughts?
The admin basically just handed the game to the rogues.
--------------------
| QUOTE (Robert Heinlein @ The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress) | "Professor, your words sound good but there is something slippery about them. Too much power in the hands of individuals--surely you would not want ... well, H-missiles for example--to be controlled by one irresponsible person?"
"My point is that one person is responsible. Always. If H-bombs exist--and they do--some man controls them. In terms of morals there is no such thing as 'state.' Just men. Individuals. Each responsible for his own acts." |
|
|
|
| Hannibal1 |
|
Command Sergeant Major

Group: NPO
Posts: 269
Member No.: 3,583
Joined: 17-May 06

|
| QUOTE (Rich333 @ Jul 12 2006, 11:51 AM) | | QUOTE (hubbird @ Jul 12 2006, 02:44 PM) | As to curbing rogue use of nukes -- what about giving them the option to sign a non-proliferation agreement as an individual nation?
Eager to hear others' thoughts. |
Really? You want to hear my thoughts?
The admin basically just handed the game to the rogues.
|
Quite true. People will love setting off nukes so the whole CN will suffer. Then the rouges will leave CN. <sadno>
This post has been edited by Hannibal1 on Jul 12 2006, 12:55 PM
|
|
|
0 User(s) are reading this topic (0 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Track this topic
Receive email notification when a reply has been made to this topic and you are not active on the board.
Subscribe to this forum
Receive email notification when a new topic is posted in this forum and you are not active on the board.
Download / Print this Topic
Download this topic in different formats or view a printer friendly version.
|