InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.

Learn More · Sign-up Now
Welcome to Cyber Nations Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Name:   Password:

THIS FORUM IS NOW A READ-ONLY ARCHIVE.
PLEASE GO TO http://forums.cybernations.net FOR THE CURRENT CYBER NATIONS FORUM.

Pages: (3) [1] 2 3  ( Go to first unread post )

:. Nuclear Smuggling
 
What do you think
Yes [ 50 ]  [32.05%]
No [ 77 ]  [49.36%]
Maybe [ 29 ]  [18.59%]
Total Votes: 156
  
Republic of Umar
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 05:46 PM


The candy man can
*

Group: Members
Posts: 776
Member No.: 34,045
Joined: 6-June 07



As it stands, the top 5% of nations can acquire nukes. That’s great and all, but I was thinking, wouldn’t it be interesting if say, you could aid a smaller nation a nuke. Think of it from an alliance standpoint. The leader could buy a nuke, and then aid it to one of his smaller nations to hold onto. This does a few things. A. Muddles the amount of nukes an alliance has (the Alliance score would reflect this, but if you aided properly, it would be hard for a bystander to calculate exactly how many nukes the alliance has). B. Can be used to keep nuke costs down, by spreading them around. C. Nations wouldn’t be so quick to jump to war, because at a lower infa level a nuke can do a lot of damage. As for how to aid a nuke I propose a nuke transfer look something like 50 lvls of tech, maybe it should cost money to aid a nuke as well. You’re not aiding 50 tech either; it just looks like it to the observer. I don’t know, I thought it'd make things a little more interesting.


--------------------
[IMG]http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb294/chase_imc/solomonbanner_final.png[/IMG]

92% of teens have moved on to rap. If you wish the other 8% would stop whining put this in your sig

Quote Thoreau
Stay classy, Cyber Nations.

QUOTE (V The King @ Sep 1 2007, 08:24 PM)
Whenever I see a thread like this one, I think "\m/ission accomplished".
Top
Rozalia
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 05:55 PM


I'm mad, insane and you better give me that water vane.
*

Group: Members
Posts: 777
Member No.: 37,494
Joined: 1-August 07



No. I'm too pissed off to give reasons.


--------------------
user posted image
Top
Haflinger
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 06:47 PM


Staff Sergeant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 138
Member No.: 37,274
Joined: 29-July 07



Absolutely not. Nuclear proliferation is not a good in-game objective. In fact, there are too many nukes as it is.


--------------------
QUOTE (Aeternos Astramora @ Aug 15 2007, 02:22 AM)
It's CN.  People need polls to tell them what to name their alliance.

QUOTE (Thoreau @ Aug 26 2007, 01:54 PM)
This post used to have a copy of the NPO War Guide. Now it has a two sentences from a moderator.

Czar_Aleksander has kicked Czar_Aleksander from #cybernations (family friendly)
Top
Matt Miller
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 07:08 PM


IRON Member State
Group Icon

Group: IRON
Posts: 114
Member No.: 3,436
Joined: 14-May 06



Perhaps the single worst idea ever. No more to say than that... <sadno>

This post has been edited by Matt Miller on Aug 19 2007, 07:10 PM


--------------------
"They who don't say what they mean will live and die by their own sword."
Magic Pie ~ Oasis
user posted image
Top
bowlingfriend
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 07:14 PM


\m/ applicant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 297
Member No.: 29,990
Joined: 17-April 07



i love it


--------------------
\m/ is the best
QUOTE (Admin)
How dare you call Planet Bob 'Earth'?

QUOTE (Admin)
It won't be counted as porn as long as the image is made into the official \m/ flag.  lol.gif
Top
Moridin
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 07:36 PM


Look, it's a tiger!
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3,925
Member No.: 8,458
Joined: 31-July 06



No. Tiny nations don't need nukes.


--------------------
In Soviet Russia, Duffman nukes YOU!!
user posted image

QUOTE (Electron Sponge)
I am better than you are.

<Tygaland> I had 40 shots of whiskey in a 2 hour drinking game and I think I nearly died

<Zulchep[STA]> "OH S---" "MORRY GO WASH YOUR HANDS FOR DINNER" "STFU MOM I'M HUNTIN' TERRORISTS"
Top
Ikarius
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 07:41 PM


Sergeant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 80
Member No.: 36,126
Joined: 6-July 07



The upkeep would kill them...


--------------------
Hail the MDC!
In Primus Officum Semper Decus-Duty First,Honour Always
The buddy system is essential to your survival; it gives the enemy somebody else to shoot at.
"Oh, what has Science wrought? I sought only to turn a man into a metal-encased juggernaught of destruction powered by the unknown properties of a myserious living crystal. How could this have all gone wrong?"
Top
Scorp
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 07:53 PM


Staff Sergeant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 145
Member No.: 24,006
Joined: 29-January 07



Nopity for obvious reasons (same reasons which you have been swimming around and trying to make positive).
Top
The Russian Empire
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 07:56 PM


No longer GPA. Last visit 02/15/08
Group Icon

Group: GPA
Posts: 2,473
Member No.: 14,307
Joined: 28-October 06



QUOTE (Matt Miller @ Aug 19 2007, 07:08 PM)
Perhaps the single worst idea ever. No more to say than that... <sadno>

I think we should restart cn and give each new nation a dozen nukes. :awesome:

~TRE
Top
Scorp
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 07:57 PM


Staff Sergeant
*

Group: Members
Posts: 145
Member No.: 24,006
Joined: 29-January 07



QUOTE (The Russian Empire @ Aug 19 2007, 07:56 PM)
I think we should restart cn and give each new nation a dozen nukes. :awesome:

~TRE

Make that a suggestion! :P
Top
The Russian Empire
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 07:59 PM


No longer GPA. Last visit 02/15/08
Group Icon

Group: GPA
Posts: 2,473
Member No.: 14,307
Joined: 28-October 06



QUOTE (Scorp @ Aug 19 2007, 07:57 PM)
QUOTE (The Russian Empire @ Aug 19 2007, 07:56 PM)
I think we should restart cn and give each new nation a dozen nukes.  :awesome:

~TRE

Make that a suggestion! :P

I'd have to warn the mods ahead of time, wouldn't I? :ehm:

~TRE
Top
Hector
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 08:02 PM


Ski-Ba-Bop-Ba-Dop-Bop
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3,369
Member No.: 11,425
Joined: 9-September 06



What about..

- Severe thinking here -

Oh okay, if theres a smaller nation under 10 nation strength in my alliance trying to kill a rogue, give him a nuke or two, and the war is over, the rogue is dead...

Hm..

Naw


This post has been edited by Hector on Aug 19 2007, 08:02 PM
Top
Hickersonopolis
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 08:04 PM


Voice of the Hickersonia Federal Caucus
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2,098
Member No.: 6,654
Joined: 12-July 06



QUOTE (Haflinger @ Aug 19 2007, 06:47 PM)
Absolutely not. Nuclear proliferation is not a good in-game objective. In fact, there are too many nukes as it is.

I disagree. Nuclear proliferation is just what this game needs to remain interesting for those of us who have come damned close to achiving nuclear capability NUMEROUS times only to watch the ranks skyrocket again and again leaving us in the dust.

I'd suggest a limit of 10 percent of max rank for nations reciving nuclear weapons as aid, only to keep things a little more fair for everyone.

This post has been edited by Hickersonopolis on Aug 19 2007, 08:05 PM


--------------------
Top
Republic of Umar
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 09:00 PM


The candy man can
*

Group: Members
Posts: 776
Member No.: 34,045
Joined: 6-June 07



QUOTE (Hickersonopolis @ Aug 19 2007, 08:04 PM)
I disagree. Nuclear proliferation is just what this game needs to remain interesting for those of us who have come damned close to achiving nuclear capability NUMEROUS times only to watch the ranks skyrocket again and again leaving us in the dust.


thank you!


--------------------
[IMG]http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb294/chase_imc/solomonbanner_final.png[/IMG]

92% of teens have moved on to rap. If you wish the other 8% would stop whining put this in your sig

Quote Thoreau
Stay classy, Cyber Nations.

QUOTE (V The King @ Sep 1 2007, 08:24 PM)
Whenever I see a thread like this one, I think "\m/ission accomplished".
Top
PlasmoDesmata
Posted on Aug 19 2007, 09:50 PM


Engaged in Perpetual Win
Group Icon

Group: GOONS
Posts: 209
Member No.: 33,483
Joined: 30-May 07



you dont need nukes if you dont have hte NS.

edit: i also voted for everything.

This post has been edited by PlasmoDesmata on Aug 19 2007, 09:51 PM


--------------------
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Dizzay R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!!!

QUOTE
so like...bananas are amazing in ALL ways


nothing offensive here.
Nation: Phospholipidia
Top
Massen
Posted on Aug 20 2007, 12:16 AM


Private First Class
*

Group: Members
Posts: 13
Member No.: 34,561
Joined: 13-June 07



No.
Top
amiles
Posted on Aug 20 2007, 12:20 AM


Fan of Red Dwarf and Blackadder
*

Group: Members
Posts: 730
Member No.: 16,868
Joined: 21-November 06



How about VFABIC!!!


--------------------
Top
Golan 1st
Posted on Aug 20 2007, 12:55 AM


ODN Secretary General
Group Icon

Group: ODN
Posts: 199
Member No.: 3,659
Joined: 18-May 06



QUOTE (Hickersonopolis @ Aug 20 2007, 05:04 AM)
I disagree. Nuclear proliferation is just what this game needs to remain interesting for those of us who have come damned close to achiving nuclear capability NUMEROUS times only to watch the ranks skyrocket again and again leaving us in the dust.

I'd suggest a limit of 10 percent of max rank for nations reciving nuclear weapons as aid, only to keep things a little more fair for everyone.

The game is fair.
Today's big nations were once small. Most of them received much less aid during their life time than those players who instead of learning the game and developing their nations keep whining about how unfair the game is.
You want nukes? Great. Meet the requirements and get them.

"those of us who have come damned close to achiving nuclear capability NUMEROUS times only to watch the ranks skyrocket again and again leaving us in the dust" surely do something wrong if this happens to them NUMEROUS times.
Top
Delta1212
Posted on Aug 20 2007, 07:37 AM


Major General
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5,958
Member No.: 8,127
Joined: 27-July 06



QUOTE (Golan 1st @ Aug 20 2007, 12:55 AM)
QUOTE (Hickersonopolis @ Aug 20 2007, 05:04 AM)
I disagree.  Nuclear proliferation is just what this game needs to remain interesting for those of us who have come damned close to achiving nuclear capability NUMEROUS times only to watch the ranks skyrocket again and again leaving us in the dust.

I'd suggest a limit of 10 percent of max rank for nations reciving nuclear weapons as aid, only to keep things a little more fair for everyone.

The game is fair.
Today's big nations were once small. Most of them received much less aid during their life time than those players who instead of learning the game and developing their nations keep whining about how unfair the game is.
You want nukes? Great. Meet the requirements and get them.

"those of us who have come damned close to achiving nuclear capability NUMEROUS times only to watch the ranks skyrocket again and again leaving us in the dust" surely do something wrong if this happens to them NUMEROUS times.

I have to agree. I haven't purchased anything but a Wonder in a month now and thusly have dropped 1.3% in the rankings. I'm still well within that top 5%. If you notice, I'm actually a couple weeks younger than Hickersonopolis. The gross sum of aid that I received as a young nation was...$6,000. Since becoming a larger nation, I've sent out tens of million in Aid. Please don't tell me it's impossible to get into the top ranks now. With the aid new nations can get, it'll take you a lot less time than it took me. (About 8-9 months).


--------------------
R.I.P. NPO - Time of Death: Aug 14 2007, 09:36 PM
Member of the Margrave Fan Club
DO NOT CLICK ->
QUOTE (admin @ Feb 14 2007, 08:50 PM)
Wow this thread is epic

QUOTE (The Fireman @ July 26 2007, 05:31 PM)
It's ok Delta, the mods still love you.  But the forum skin is not a user and we cannot warn it.
Top
Lord Sharpe
Posted on Aug 20 2007, 07:42 AM


Minister of Sexy Parties
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2,216
Member No.: 24,131
Joined: 30-January 07



I actually think this is pretty cool, though there would have to be some absurd consequences, maybe aiding a nuke to a smaller nation = auto sanction of both nations for 10 days.


--------------------
Hmmm.... Not much to put here.
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
InvisionFree - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.
Learn More · Sign-up Now

Topic OptionsPages: (3) [1] 2 3 



Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1489 seconds | Archive