View Full Version: FAN long term victory?

Cyber Nations Forums > National & War > FAN long term victory?


Title: FAN long term victory?


rebel_lead3r - August 5, 2007 02:16 PM (GMT)
basicly my thery is that fan will get so many nations at 1000strength that it will compleatly overwelm wut at that level

:D

Fredistania - August 5, 2007 02:40 PM (GMT)
Aiding attacked nations at that level would be considerable less costly than exchanging nukes at the 25-60k levels

El Pilchinator - August 5, 2007 02:41 PM (GMT)
No.

Beyondvalor - August 5, 2007 02:42 PM (GMT)
*sigh* No. It only takes a good one or two mil to low level nations like that for them to destroy any FAN resistance. And with the numerical advantages, I don't see this being a problem.

TheyCallMeJeezy - August 5, 2007 02:57 PM (GMT)
basically your theory is wrong

K1L1O_n1Mr4 - August 5, 2007 03:28 PM (GMT)
hmm...i think there's always a chance in every event in this world. Just not to be overconfidence :)

OPArsenal - August 5, 2007 03:34 PM (GMT)
Was this thread necessary? No. No, it wasn't.

Altnabla - August 5, 2007 03:46 PM (GMT)
I laughed

fransjosef - August 5, 2007 06:52 PM (GMT)
Maybe they will have better 1000 NS-nations than WUT.

Kim Jong Hendo - August 5, 2007 07:08 PM (GMT)
my thry is dat u hav bad grammer lolz

QUOTE (Translated)
My theory is that you have bad grammar. Lol.

Prime minister Johns - August 5, 2007 08:13 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Kim Jong Hendo @ Aug 5 2007, 01:08 PM)
my thry is dat u hav bad grammer lolz

QUOTE (Translated)
My theory is that you have bad grammar. Lol.

lolz is a corruption of lulz witch is a corruption of lol. :P

The_ Evil_Jester - August 5, 2007 08:59 PM (GMT)
This is a repeat thread Certainly you could have stated your opinion in that thread instead of creating this one?




* Hosted for free by InvisionFree