Title: Moderation suggestion
Description: to end all calls of bias, etc
Sir Galahad - December 13, 2006 11:14 PM (GMT)
24 mods
2 from each of the sanctioned alliances
there you go
Doland Grimnoir - December 13, 2006 11:16 PM (GMT)
Friendly - December 13, 2006 11:19 PM (GMT)
I throw in a thirding of the idea, if'n it's needed or appreciated. if not, translate that thirding to 'I SUPPORT THIS IDEA!'. :))
Smith - December 13, 2006 11:20 PM (GMT)
It's been suggested numerous times and shot down for numerous reasons. The mod staff is already diverse with just about every alliance represented anyway.
Moderators shouldn't be hired and fired based on their alliances (and when an alliance got unsanctioned, that's exactly what'd happen) but their ability.
Ertyy - December 13, 2006 11:22 PM (GMT)
That would be bad for two reasons:
1. It would confer modships on people just because of their position in an alliance.
2. It goes against the fundamental rule of "What admin says, goes." I know I wouldn't want to screw around with making sure EVERY alliance gets their guys in. It would be alliance affirmative action gone wrong (note how I used "gone wrong." I have nothing against affirmative action in the general sense).
Sir Galahad - December 13, 2006 11:22 PM (GMT)
Well, the current situation proves the system in place does not work Smith
The Mod - December 13, 2006 11:24 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Ertyy @ Dec 13 2006, 05:22 PM) |
That would be bad for two reasons:
1. It would confer modships on people just because of their position in an alliance.
2. It goes against the fundamental rule of "What admin says, goes." I know I wouldn't want to screw around with making sure EVERY alliance gets their guys in. It would be alliance affirmative action gone wrong (note how I used "gone wrong." I have nothing against affirmative action in the general sense). |
True. This has been suggested several times, and will never be implemented. Thread Locked.
