Title: Civil Wars
Description: Possible feature...
thelostsoul - August 12, 2006 01:30 AM (GMT)
I was thinking for things like picking a government or religion that citizen dislike (not the same as not picking the one they want) for an extended period of time, doing various things against your government positions, performing certain actions (like building up a powerful military), etc. they could contribute to a certain number, where, once that number reaches a certain point, citizens will be heavily angered and possibly revolt and start a war. The war could be for a specific government type, religion, etc...
I know it's not very descriptive, but there's plenty of room for other user's creativity as well administrative creativity ;)
Thoughts? Ideas? Good? Bad?
TGO - August 12, 2006 02:55 AM (GMT)
Make a small portion of your armed forces turn on you. Could be fun but no.
Commander Cody - August 12, 2006 04:36 AM (GMT)
This could be interesting.
Perhaps after a civil war, you can install a puppet government in the new forming nation. Then you get 2 nations. They your nation multiplies into 2 nations. Then after awhile if you want you can merge the two together or keep them seperated but under your control.
Afterall, who is to say that your current government, could not instal your a member of your Royal Family into power.
But I still think NO and I voted NO.
thelostsoul - August 12, 2006 04:52 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Commander Cody @ Aug 11 2006, 10:36 PM) |
This could be interesting.
Perhaps after a civil war, you can install a puppet government in the new forming nation. Then you get 2 nations. They your nation multiplies into 2 nations. Then after awhile if you want you can merge the two together or keep them seperated but under your control.
Afterall, who is to say that your current government, could not instal your a member of your Royal Family into power.
|
Hmm, that's a pretty interesting idea...I like it!
| QUOTE |
| But I still think NO and I voted NO. |
Heh, yea...I expected that from a lotta people, which was why I made that option lol
Varuna - August 12, 2006 08:11 AM (GMT)
LOL. It might be fun...
But no.
Maybe if your citizen happiness goes to negative numbers...?
THAT would be good. xD
I'd like to see a nation with negative happiness going dowwwwnnnn. Especially if they were in my range. LOL.
But still no.
Slayer of Cliffracers - August 12, 2006 09:36 AM (GMT)
I think un-happiness should throw you into anarchy/chaos, which has possibility of civil war when you come out of anarchy/chaos and another when you transfer from transitional to another form of goverment.
Cadian Empire - August 12, 2006 01:12 PM (GMT)
General Delta - August 14, 2006 03:05 AM (GMT)
thats a bad idea cuz then ur happiness and stuff would go down a lot cuz ur fighting ur own nation.
Unsure - August 15, 2006 02:22 AM (GMT)
No. I'm buying as many nukes as I want, and I'm not sending my nation to hell for it.
Pius XIII - August 15, 2006 04:33 AM (GMT)
No. I like keeping my government at monarchy (the best government effects-wise) and my religion at Christianity (1 happiness doesn't mean much and it's for RP reasons).
LorNightmare - September 1, 2007 07:22 AM (GMT)
x Tela x - September 1, 2007 08:30 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (LorNightmare @ Sep 1 2007, 02:22 AM) |
| its a good idea |
Heinous! ROFLMAO
:(( gravediggers :((
Rozalia - September 1, 2007 09:25 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (x Tela x @ Sep 1 2007, 08:30 AM) |
Heinous! ROFLMAO
:(( gravediggers :(( |
I must admitt. He dug a large grave.
