Replying to A history of the AoO?
Unregistered User Info
Enter your Name
Code Buttons
 Guided Mode
 Normal Mode 		  Close all Tags

Open Tags:   
Enter your Post
Clickable Smilies
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
smilie smilie smilie
     
Show All

Check Post Length · BB Code Help
Post Options  Enable emoticons?
 Enable signature?
Original Post to Quote
You may edit the post you are quoting here
Post Icons
Cancel Post
Send Post
                                
                                
  [ Use None ]
User Verification To keep away spam, please complete the following:
 



Last 10 Posts [ In reverse order ]
Jack Layton Posted on Jan 20 2012, 01:31 AM
  See the Alliance Direction forum for suggested changes. I mentioned the Historian idea, credited to you, of course.

It's my intention to gather people's suggestions for changes, if they want to make any, and put them to a vote.
Areceus Posted on Jan 19 2012, 11:55 PM
  Hell this one of those shoot the bull possible ideas. It's technically useless yet maybe we'd add it later
Jack Layton Posted on Jan 19 2012, 06:14 AM
  I'm meh on the history idea. It doesn't matter to me either way. If Areceus wants to compile that information, all the power to him, but it isn't something that I'd personally pursue.
Jmborwell Posted on Jan 19 2012, 01:08 AM
 
QUOTE (Areceus @ Jan 15 2012, 09:07 PM)
It would be nice to see a history of allour major wars, battles, nuclear purchases members joined and things like that all dated and written down a full history of well, US


We could also make a historian

Talk to the Chief of Internal affairs! He can do what he wishes with regard to the inner workings of the alliance with forming comitees and posting information and asking members to post certain places. If you need privy's on the forum for some reason let me know.

JM
Jmborwell Posted on Jan 19 2012, 01:06 AM
 
QUOTE (Areceus @ Jan 16 2012, 12:40 AM)
QUOTE (Jack Layton @ Jan 16 2012, 03:23 AM)
Personally I think we need to clearly demarcate powers and responsibilities of government positions. The Charter is clear on some things like the elections process, but not extremely clear on the responsibilities of each member of government.

I actually agree. As a chief of FA can I have the power to cut trade or an alliance with people at a whim? No, and we must make things a good deal less vague.... I'm still in favor of a history thread

History thread is good.

As well as what you guys are talking about, the ruling government votes on all of that. needs a 3/5 take actions as an alliance that do not deal with war/treaties. For war it takes a majority of the alliance and a 3/5 vote of the ruling government.

JM
Areceus Posted on Jan 16 2012, 05:40 AM
 
QUOTE (Jack Layton @ Jan 16 2012, 03:23 AM)
Personally I think we need to clearly demarcate powers and responsibilities of government positions. The Charter is clear on some things like the elections process, but not extremely clear on the responsibilities of each member of government.

I actually agree. As a chief of FA can I have the power to cut trade or an alliance with people at a whim? No, and we must make things a good deal less vague.... I'm still in favor of a history thread
Jack Layton Posted on Jan 16 2012, 03:23 AM
  Personally I think we need to clearly demarcate powers and responsibilities of government positions. The Charter is clear on some things like the elections process, but not extremely clear on the responsibilities of each member of government.
Areceus Posted on Jan 16 2012, 02:07 AM
  It would be nice to see a history of allour major wars, battles, nuclear purchases members joined and things like that all dated and written down a full history of well, US


We could also make a historian
Review the complete topic (launches new window)

Hosted for free by InvisionFree* (Terms of Use: Updated 2/10/2010) | Powered by Invision Power Board v1.3 Final © 2003 IPS, Inc.
Page creation time: 0.1093 seconds | Archive